Better than WikiLeaks...Trump Survelliance proven!!!!

#1
V

volfan2024

“Wanna play ball scarecrow “
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Messages
12,941
Likes
2,693
#1
Caught em in a lie again. Already trying to LIE their way out it AGAIN! But ,but, but, I,I,I,I!
 
#9
#9
Carl Pickens said:
Lol..... the unfit idiot seems to be one step ahead of everyone else...trolling the liberal emotions
Click to expand...

Where it gets bad for them, by law, any info about Trump as he was not part of the WARRANT is suppose to be deleted. Instead it was passed along to the Hillary campaign.

This is going to be bad for the dems. Very bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#10
#10
I'm concerned about all the "incidental collection" that this investigation seems to be shedding light on. Not for Trump, but for Americans in general.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#12
#12
Obsessed said:
Where it gets bad for them, by law, any info about Trump as he was not part of the WARRANT is suppose to be deleted. Instead it was passed along to the Hillary campaign.

This is going to be bad for the dems. Very bad.
Click to expand...

American citizens not part of the surveillance are supposed to have their identities protected. Only a handful of people in the government have the authority to authorize those names to be revealed...and there has to be an justified need to do so..

I think the bigger picture here should be how under the Obama administration the rights of American citizens, CITIZENS (call down libtards), were basically ignored in regards to surveillance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#13
#13
FLVOL_79 said:
American citizens not part of the surveillance are supposed to have their identities protected. Only a handful of people in the government have the authority to authorize those names to be revealed...and there has to be an justified need to do so..

I think the bigger picture here should be how under the Obama administration the rights of American citizens, CITIZENS (call down libtards), were basically ignored in regards to surveillance.
Click to expand...

The NSA Admiral Rogers said 20 people including himself have the authorization to unmask.
 
#15
#15
Obsessed said:
Trump was right, yet again
Click to expand...

In no way does this validate Trump's claim of 'wiretapping' at Trump Tower. Even by House Intel Chief Rep. Devin Nunes own admission, this involved the legal collection of information. It has been said repeatedly on this forum that it was likely to be revealed that members of Trump's transition team had intelligence collected upon incidentally. Trump's claim of wiretapping was still false and his tweets reckless but I'm not surprised to see that some of his supporters will use this as a form of validation in spite of everything that Rep. Devin Nunes added to that... and what Comey said on Monday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#16
#16
BowlBrother85 said:
In no way does this validate Trump's claim of 'wiretapping' at Trump Tower. Even by House Intel Chief Rep. Devin Nunes own admission, this involved the legal collection of information. It has been said repeatedly on this forum that it was likely to be revealed that members of Trump's transition team had intelligence collected upon incidentally. Trump's claim of wiretapping was still false and his tweets reckless but I'm not surprised to see that some of his supporters will use this as a form of validation in spite of everything that Rep. Devin Nunes added to that... and what Comey said on Monday.
Click to expand...

It's ****ing illegal
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#23
#23
BowlBrother85 said:
It was legal - so said Devin Nunes. The dems are not the ones currently under an FBI investigation for collusion with the Russian government.
Click to expand...

You don't seem to understand.

The warrant was for certain things. Info received on trump, by law, was to be deleted. It wasn't.

That's illegal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#24
#24
Sin City Vol said:
Explain how it's illegal???
Click to expand...

House Intel Chief Rep. Devin Nunes (a Republican and member of Trump's transition team no less) has gone out of his way to say that it was legal! These idiots here think they know more than him! What reason would he have to cover for the democrats? Good lord!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top