I'm going to go ahead and guess that the Gorsuch nomination will be the best thing Trump does in the next 4 years.
Unfortunately, it's a partisan mess at the moment. There is a lot, and I mean a metric ****-ton, of butthurt over the Garland situation from the DNC side of the house.
I'd expect a fairly strict party line vote for nomination with the possibility of some of the more conservative "leaning" Senators (Manchin, Testor, etc) to cross over to vote for him. He'll get voted in unless it comes out he's been taking trips to Tijuana for animal shows or something.
What do you find appealing about Gorsuch?
He's stood up for property rights/right to privacy AKA castle doctrine, even when his opinions weren't very popular among conservatives.
His opinion on the Chevron case speaks volumes about him. He has a problem with judicial deference to agencies because they are not accountable to the people.
He seems very principled. I would go so far to say that he might be the absolute best we could hope for. This is somebody who I think Rand Paul would have strongly considered, if he were president.
Unfortunately, it's a partisan mess at the moment. There is a lot, and I mean a metric ****-ton, of butthurt over the Garland situation from the DNC side of the house.
I'd expect a fairly strict party line vote for nomination with the possibility of some of the more conservative "leaning" Senators (Manchin, Testor, etc) to cross over to vote for him. He'll get voted in unless it comes out he's been taking trips to Tijuana for animal shows or something.
The Dems, rightfully, are pizzed off about that. On the other hand, Gorsuch seems qualified and pretty much free of any real scandal.
I think he will be confirmed. The Dems just got outplayed by the GOP on Garland, who was also well qualified.
I understand there will be some resentment over what happened. However, wrong forum to being up said disgust IMO. This was Gorsuch's hearing and it should have been focused on him. Not throwing a temper tantrum for the benefit of C-SPAN.
Um, yeah, this is Congress, so pretty much every second of every day is spent in some form of self-promotion.
Sen. Patrick Leahy is up, and immediately raises Merrick Garland.
Leahy asks if he thinks Garland was treated fairly, and Gorsuch says it would be "imprudent" to comment on that.
Day 2 and some people cannot contain themselves.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...eme-court-hearings-second-day-watch-live.html
What a stupid question to ask. And Feinstein is showing her true colors.