Mandatory DNA Testing: This will never happen in America

[Rasputin_Vol]

No way this happens here. To think otherwise would be tin foil hat talk...

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqoJNVXwNBM[/youtube]

 

[volfanhill]

It's pretty safe to say it's the only hat you own.

 

[apevol]

Summary from someone who isn't on a slow piece of **** phone?

My thoughts on thread title alone:

My DNA, along with all bodily fluids are mine own. It should be illegal to require urine samples, blood tests, hair, or salival tests for any reason but warranted suspicion of serious criminal activity.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Summary from someone who isn't on a slow piece of **** phone?

My thoughts on thread title alone:

My DNA, along with all bodily fluids are mine own. It should be illegal to require urine samples, blood tests, hair, or salival tests for any reason but warranted suspicion of serious criminal activity.

What if it meant we could bring more lawbreakers to justice?

 

[apevol]

What if it meant we could bring more lawbreakers to justice?

Without warranted suspicion for an actual crime committed, no.

 

[apevol]

Btw, its too late for me anyway. I am in the database.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Btw, its too late for me anyway. I am in the database.

Me too.

 

[Velo Vol]

If the U.S. faced half the terrorism that many Middle East countries deal with we'd have this and more tomorrow.

 

[Thunder Good-Oil]

A condition for amnesty to the 14,000,000 illegals already here. Wrong thread?

 

[apevol]

Me too.

Why? If you don't mind, of course.

 

[volinbham]

Btw, its too late for me anyway. I am in the database.

Me too.

Not me suckers!

 

[ajvol01]

Summary from someone who isn't on a slow piece of **** phone?

My thoughts on thread title alone:

My DNA, along with all bodily fluids are mine own. It should be illegal to require urine samples, blood tests, hair, or salival tests for any reason but warranted suspicion of serious criminal activity.

I'd recommend you don't join the armed forces.

They started collecting DNA in '93 - told us it would be used to ID remains. And yes - it was mandatory.

 

[joevol33]

There was some story on the news awhile back about people getting pulled over and asked to give a DNA sample. Some started complaining, and one lady called the news. I can't remember their explanation for it.

 

[apevol]

I'd recommend you don't join the armed forces.

They started collecting DNA in '93 - told us it would be used to ID remains. And yes - it was mandatory.

That's the price you've got to pay for having the luxury of being the one paying the price, I suppose.

 

[apevol]

Not me suckers!

Man, in my mind you're always just about ready to wreck that car in your avi.

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

Never say never.

 

[hog88]

I'd recommend you don't join the armed forces.

They started collecting DNA in '93 - told us it would be used to ID remains. And yes - it was mandatory.

It was only supposed to be used to identify remains is what they told us. I understand now that it's in the system and searchable by police.