You're welcome. I'll elaborate on what I think is fact vs. speculation.
- The info on the Nixon gold shock, petrodollar, and reserve currency is solid IMO. Whether or not we would need to wage war all over the globe to protect the dollar is pure speculation. There is a good video floating around the web of a speech GEN Wesley Clark made when he was running for president. He claimed the pentagon was developing plans to invade 7 countries in 5 years. Of course the DOD plans contingencies for all kinds of stuff, so the reasoning for all these conflicts is pure speculation.
- There a little off on fractional reserve banking, but they get the gist of it.
- They're drawing conclusions on ISIS in Syria based on selective information. I'm convinced we armed the rebels in Syria well before the congressional approval, but it's a giant leap to say our government is running ISIS. Regarding the chemical weapons, there is a solid MIT research paper that concludes the Syrian rebels gassed their own people.
- Their Libya hypothesis does have a lot of info to back it up. There was a pretty good article that came out shortly after Qaddafi was murdered by the group Former Intelligence Professionals for Sanity. You would have to make up your own mind on whether or not our foreign policy in Libya was nefarious, inept, or worked for the common good.