lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 70,249
- Likes
- 41,335
He goes off on the reporter for asking the question about Amtrak funding, calls it "dumb" and says the obvious problem was that the train was going twice the speed limit.
His idiocy is that the mechanism that everyone is talking about and which had not come on line yet there would have stopped the train from going that fast.
You can debate all you want about Amtrak being wasteful, inefficient, whether funding is adequate/inadequate. But it is undeniable that his reasoning on this particular event was just inexplicably moronic.
His idiocy is that the mechanism that everyone is talking about and which had not come on line yet there would have stopped the train from going that fast.
You can debate all you want about Amtrak being wasteful, inefficient, whether funding is adequate/inadequate. But it is undeniable that his reasoning on this particular event was just inexplicably moronic.