Should the EPA be armed?

#14
#14
Sandvol said:
At least we know where all the ammo is going. Maybe the federal government doesn't trust local law enforcement anymore.
Click to expand...

Only the crappy .40 Short and Worthless.

And that's not even half as bad as that .357 Sig round :p
 
#18
#18
Grand Vol said:
Not in the context of the article. Never.

Having said that to say this. I would not be opposed to selective arming for a self defense purpose while in the Alaskan wilderness. Critter protection so to speak. Otherwise for enforcement purposes, no.
Click to expand...

I still say no. Let the bears eat em.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#19
#19
No need for guns unless they're in a situation like GV said......as far as the agency itself..... I Think it has its place. I've seen first hand a lot of really nasty **** in the ground and water.
The neighborhood where I grew up included. A drainage ditch ran through it and most everyone thought it was a creek. It came from the nearby DuPont plant and ran through the neighborhood before emptying into the Cumberland river. My aunt lived in the house beside it......she developed a brain tumor and died..... The lady across the street from her that also lived next to it developed one and died...... Her neighbor on the other side did as well ..... She lived but has a child like mentality about her. Another neighbor who had grown up there and played in the ditch, but had moved away also developed one and died .....four brain tumors within 200 ft of each other
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#22
#22
Why wouldn't they just contract the gun toters for the EPA. These EPA goons would have to get qualified shooting and training for their weapon.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top