AggieInTN
Si vis pacem para bellum
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2014
- Messages
- 99
- Likes
- 0
Justice Department Operations | Video | C-SPAN.org
All that I've seen so far is Rep. Conyers kissing up.
All that I've seen so far is Rep. Conyers kissing up.
You're articulate and well dressed?
“I think that one of the things that we learned when we were trying to get passed those common sense reforms last year, Vice President Biden and I had a meeting with a group of technology people and we talked about how guns can be made more safe,” he said.
“By making them either through finger print identification, the gun talks to a bracelet or something that you might wear, how guns can be used only by the person who is lawfully in possession of the weapon.”
That would either mean I'm married or gay lol
Anyway, back on topic, some related info. Title is misleading as they aren't specifically looking at just the bracelets.
Holder: We Want to Explore Gun Tracking Bracelets | Washington Free Beacon
That would either mean I'm married or gay lol
Anyway, back on topic, some related info. Title is misleading as they aren't specifically looking at just the bracelets.
Holder: We Want to Explore Gun Tracking Bracelets | Washington Free Beacon
Makes sense I suppose. It's like a car want start when you're too drunk to drive. The gun want fire without the right kind of finger prints on the gun.
Sorry, don't trust it. Anything electronic can and will fail. There are safety mechanisms already for firearms:
And how long before criminals can find a way around these "safety" features? An 8 year old kid can hack an iPhone faster than I can figure out how to make a call.
Sorry, don't trust them.
adding another potential failure point into the shooting process is problematic.
you can clear a typical malfunction; how would you clear a dropped from your transmitter? Hell, my microwave cuts out my home network; better hope I'm not making popcorn when someone breaks in.