 |
10-25-2006, 04:05 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Rational Thought Allowed? Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,362
| Interesting Survery regarding select Muslims Quote: |
Muslims For A Safe America conducted a survey at the Islamic Society of North America’s 43rd Annual Convention in Chicago from September 1, 2006 to September 4, 2006.
| Quote: 1. Are you a U.S. Citizen? (If no, then don’t fill out survey.)
YES 307
NO 0
| This is very important as you read further results. These are American Citizens who harbor the following thoughts. Quote: 5. Did Muslims hijack planes and fly them into buildings on 9/11?
YES 117
NO 139
UNDECIDED 51 6. Did the U.S. government have advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks, and allow the attacks to occur?
YES 200
NO 70
UNDECIDED 37 7. Did the U.S. government organize the 9/11 attacks?
YES 106
NO 151
UNDECIDED 50 8. Are the tapes of Osama Bin Laden, claiming responsibility for the 9/11 attacks and threatening future attacks, real or fake?
REAL 126
FAKE 129
UNDECIDED 52 | Quote: 15. Is it justifiable for the U.S. government to do any of the following in an attempt to prevent terrorist attacks in America:
d. having an informer pretend to support or encourage violence against America, to see if the targeted Muslims will decide to attack American targets?
YES 35
NO 258
UNDECIDED 14 g. allowing Muslim illegal aliens to stay in America if they agree to work as informants, monitoring the Muslim community for the government?
YES 21
NO 277
UNDECIDED 9
| Quote: 21. Should Iran develop nuclear weapons?
YES 161
NO 123
UNDECIDED 23
| Quote: 25. Was America justified in invading Afghanistan after 9/11?
YES 51
NO 248
UNDECIDED 8
| Quote: 26. Is violence by Muslims against American civilians acceptable, in retaliation for the American government’s actions in the Muslim world?
YES 23
NO 274
UNDECIDED 10 27. Is violence by Muslims against the American military overseas acceptable, in retaliation for the American government’s actions in the Muslim world?
YES 134
NO 154
UNDECIDED 19 28. Is violence by Muslims against the American military in the U.S. acceptable, in retaliation for the American government’s actions in the Muslim world?
YES 73
NO 211
UNDECIDED 23 29. Is violence by Muslims against American government officials acceptable, in retaliation for the American government’s actions in the Muslim world?
YES 51
NO 231
UNDECIDED 25
| Quote: 30. If you learned about a plot by Muslims to attack targets inside America, would you tell law enforcement authorities?
YES 234
NO 39
UNDECIDED 34
| Muslims For A Safe America » Blog Archive » Survey Conducted At 2006 ISNA Convention
Oh, before I forget, all of these responses came from Muslims who volunteerily stopped by the "Muslims for a safe America" booth during the 2006 ISNA Convention.
__________________ LG, when I think of UT football I think about world class sprinter WR's, like Gault,...fast bruising hard to tackle RB's, great OL play and a D that'll knock your d**k in the dirt. That's from the Johnny Major era thru the Philip Fulmer era.--HIGHTIDE 25 APR
Nam esse vitium et non nocere non potest |
| |
10-25-2006, 05:14 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | MY sources say... Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 8,534
| Hmmm...unscientific polls. Someone could have come by repeatedly and responded in the same manner. Seeing this appearing to be loaded questions and it being unscientific, why are we discussing this?  |
| |
10-25-2006, 06:16 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Rational Thought Allowed? Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,362
| I just found it very interesting, to say the least.
__________________ LG, when I think of UT football I think about world class sprinter WR's, like Gault,...fast bruising hard to tackle RB's, great OL play and a D that'll knock your d**k in the dirt. That's from the Johnny Major era thru the Philip Fulmer era.--HIGHTIDE 25 APR
Nam esse vitium et non nocere non potest |
| |
10-26-2006, 11:11 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | MY sources say... Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 8,534
| Send the ones born here home? Nation of Islam as well? |
| |
10-26-2006, 01:08 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | 5 Star Mod | Quote:
Originally Posted by herksrus Well if they dont feel we have a right to protect ourselves from attacks then they can just go back to where they originialy came from. | Well, maybe they would have been a little more understanding if the U.S. actually went after the people that attacked us instead of going to Iraq to create new ones. |
| |
10-26-2006, 01:58 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Florida
Posts: 271
| Quote:
Originally Posted by OWB Well, maybe they would have been a little more understanding if the U.S. actually went after the people that attacked us instead of going to Iraq to create new ones. |
I know alot of folks dont believe this but we are taking the fight to the enemy. Killing him there so he has alot of his assets "warm bodies" tied up over there.
"BUSH LIED, PEOPLE DIED" I honestly think our leadership thought Saddam stilll had his stuff in country. Truth is our intel sucked! Our guys had bad info coming in and so they made a hard decision to attack, maybe they should have gotten some more intel before striking.
Saddam had been blowing off the sanctions ever since they were put in place. I didnt help that the un was in bed with him eith their oil for riches program. |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 AM. | | |