2143 users online now!   CONTACT US | ADVERTISE | REGISTER       

About this Page -- This is a discussion on Chavez wants to move UN. within the forum Politics. Chavez says UN should be moved out of NY and put in Venezuela. Oh can we oblige him, pretty please. ...

Go Back   VolNation > Other Forums > The Pub > Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-20-2006, 12:42 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
allvol123's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,577
Chavez wants to move UN

Chavez says UN should be moved out of NY and put in Venezuela. Oh can we oblige him, pretty please.
allvol123 is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 12:55 PM   #2 (permalink)
Dolemite's Driver
 
CSpindizzy's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 7,660
What difference does it make where the building is? It's still going to be the same.
CSpindizzy is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 12:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
Dolemite's Driver
 
CSpindizzy's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 7,660
Only difference is that if it moves to Venezuela, Caracas gets the numerous unpaid parking tickets.
CSpindizzy is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 01:11 PM   #4 (permalink)
Rational Thought Allowed?
 
therealUT's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,361
I say we move the UN, then remove ourselves from the UN.
__________________
LG, when I think of UT football I think about world class sprinter WR's, like Gault,...fast bruising hard to tackle RB's, great OL play and a D that'll knock your d**k in the dirt. That's from the Johnny Major era thru the Philip Fulmer era.--HIGHTIDE 25 APR

Nam esse vitium et non nocere non potest
therealUT is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 01:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
Dolemite's Driver
 
CSpindizzy's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 7,660
Then Bolton would be out of a job....I like it!
CSpindizzy is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 01:16 PM   #6 (permalink)
Rational Thought Allowed?
 
therealUT's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,361
More importantly, Annan would be out of a job and France would basically be removed from importance in world affairs.
__________________
LG, when I think of UT football I think about world class sprinter WR's, like Gault,...fast bruising hard to tackle RB's, great OL play and a D that'll knock your d**k in the dirt. That's from the Johnny Major era thru the Philip Fulmer era.--HIGHTIDE 25 APR

Nam esse vitium et non nocere non potest
therealUT is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 01:18 PM   #7 (permalink)
Dolemite's Driver
 
CSpindizzy's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 7,660
How do you figure? France is quite plugged in with many nations even outside of the UN's domain.
CSpindizzy is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 01:21 PM   #8 (permalink)
Rational Thought Allowed?
 
therealUT's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,361
Considering that the US is the biggest factor on the world stage, the only reason that the US ever tries to placate France is because France has veto power in the UN. Remove that and the US does as it pleases and France either comes around to realizing that not everything in the world is there to serve the betterment of the Gauls or they erode away on the world stage.
__________________
LG, when I think of UT football I think about world class sprinter WR's, like Gault,...fast bruising hard to tackle RB's, great OL play and a D that'll knock your d**k in the dirt. That's from the Johnny Major era thru the Philip Fulmer era.--HIGHTIDE 25 APR

Nam esse vitium et non nocere non potest
therealUT is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 01:30 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
allvol123's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by therealUT View Post
I say we move the UN, then remove ourselves from the UN.
I meant imply that in my original statement as well.
allvol123 is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 01:55 PM   #10 (permalink)
Dolemite's Driver
 
CSpindizzy's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 7,660
Bush would never let that happen. I'd imagine no US president would let that happen.
CSpindizzy is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 01:56 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
allvol123's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSpindizzy View Post
Bush would never let that happen. I'd imagine no US president would let that happen.

I imagine you are right, and I don't imagine that sux.
allvol123 is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 02:02 PM   #12 (permalink)
Rational Thought Allowed?
 
therealUT's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSpindizzy View Post
Bush would never let that happen. I'd imagine no US president would let that happen.
This statement makes the UN sounds as though it were some holy institution that has been around since the days of Genesis. It is barely 50 years old and it has done nothing for the greater good of humanity. The UN will most certainly not be around to see its 150th birthday, if it even makes it to its 100th.
__________________
LG, when I think of UT football I think about world class sprinter WR's, like Gault,...fast bruising hard to tackle RB's, great OL play and a D that'll knock your d**k in the dirt. That's from the Johnny Major era thru the Philip Fulmer era.--HIGHTIDE 25 APR

Nam esse vitium et non nocere non potest
therealUT is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 02:05 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
allvol123's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by therealUT View Post
This statement makes the UN sounds as though it were some holy institution that has been around since the days of Genesis. It is barely 50 years old and it has done nothing for the greater good of humanity. The UN will most certainly not be around to see its 150th birthday, if it even makes it to its 100th.

I agree with that too. I was more or less agreeing no US President will make this move anytime soon. I don't see any real leaders in the US making this move at this time.
allvol123 is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 02:15 PM   #14 (permalink)
Dolemite's Driver
 
CSpindizzy's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 7,660
Quote:
Originally Posted by therealUT View Post
This statement makes the UN sounds as though it were some holy institution that has been around since the days of Genesis. It is barely 50 years old and it has done nothing for the greater good of humanity. The UN will most certainly not be around to see its 150th birthday, if it even makes it to its 100th.
That statement says nothing of the sort. Good way to take something that doesn't exist out of a statement.

Clearly Bush would be the closest President to a line of thinking to walk from the UN. Even after its peak of corruption, Bush's response was to send Bolton in there to straighten things out. Bolton cannot handle that so the status quo remains. We'll remain to rattle our sabre and threaten veto votes and still nothing is accomplished.
CSpindizzy is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 02:16 PM   #15 (permalink)
Dolemite's Driver
 
CSpindizzy's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 7,660
Ambiguity tends to survive longer than the firm, strict, and concrete.
CSpindizzy is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 PM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24