Not terrorism!

#1

gsvol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
14,179
Likes
9
#1
FBI will not prosecute bombing of government building bombing with IED as terrorism due to "political sensitivities" - Atlas Shrugs

The typically quiet town of Casa Grande, Arizona was rocked by an explosion at the local Social Security Administration office early Friday morning by what appears to an improvised explosive device (IED). ---------------------------

This is as bad as the actual bombing. Afraid of violating the sharia and offending the feelings of jihadists, the FBI (Justus dept) will not be prosecuting the bombing of a government building with an IED as terror due to "political sensitivities." It just gets worse and worse. Muslim bombs government office in Arizona.

th


I'm going to go out on a limb here and bet the Iraqi in question doen't belong to the NRA because if he did, it would definately be terrorism as determined by the current progressive liberal mindset.
 
#2
#2
link to any reputable site claiming "political sensitivities"?
 
#3
#3
All people that work for the Obama Administration are wimps & lazy people that don't do there job for the average American citizen. These fools that keep this man in Office of President will wake up to the truth one day & say "I'm tired of being raped constantly by this clown & the people that work for him." They cash their check at the end of the week & sleep good at night not caring one iota about this great country or the people that live in it. They defend the Radical Islamist & are scared of what they may do. Obama has no balls to keep any promise he makes cause he knows that lying & being deceitful is his main game. They figure out a way each day to bring the country down & to break our spirits for the love of country & to our fellow man. Obama is one sick dude who really needs to get some help with the old brain that's suppose to be in that fat head of his. Spending more money we don't have will not solve the problem of unemployment or jump start the economy. What an idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5
#5
Iraqi Refugee Bombs AZ Social Security Office: MSM Remains Silent

On Friday night, both CNN and Reuters reported the bombing, but neither identified Aldosary or mentioned his Iraqi roots. It seems Aldosary is getting the same benefits the MSM gave Major Nidal Hasan, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, and innumerable other individuals with Middle Eastern names when they committed terrorist acts in our country.

Pathetic.....
 
#6
#6
Suddenly I feel like Volmav.....

Even though Aldosary’s identity was known to news agencies on Friday after his arrest, national and international media outlets, such as CNN and Reuters who published reports late Friday night, noted his arrest but not his identity. And none but local media have reported Aldosary’s name ever since.

Now imagine if a Tea Partier – or even someone who shared the same name as a Tea Partier – had fire bombed a federal facility less than a month after Barack Obama’s reelection. Anyone think it would be getting more media coverage?

Hmm, that's a tough one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7
#7
FBI will not prosecute bombing of government building bombing with IED as terrorism due to "political sensitivities" - Atlas Shrugs



th


I'm going to go out on a limb here and bet the Iraqi in question doen't belong to the NRA because if he did, it would definately be terrorism as determined by the current progressive liberal mindset.

Interesting consistency here:

In the wake of the Planned Parenthood bombing in Grand Chute, Wis., the Federal Bureau of Investigation has reaffirmed its commitment to protecting women's access to reproductive health facilities.

Teresa Carlson, special agent-in-charge of the FBI's Milwaukee office, announced the arrest of 50-year-old Francis Grady for "arson of a building used in interstate commerce" and "intentionally damaging the property of a facility that provides reproductive health services" on Tuesday. She said in a statement, "The FBI will always investigate and bring to justice anyone who resorts to violence as a means to harm, intimidate, or prevent the public's right to access reproductive health services."

Wisconsin Planned Parenthood Bombing Draws FBI Vow To Protect Public Access To Abortion Clinics

Authorities say a homeless man charged Thursday with setting a New Year's Day fire that gutted a family planning clinic told investigators he acted out of a strong disbelief in abortion and was also fueled by seeing a young woman enter the clinic while he looked on recently with protesters.

Bobby Joe Rogers, 41, was charged with one count of damaging a building by fire or explosive and was being held Thursday at the Escambia County Jail in the Florida Panhandle region.

Man charged in Fla. abortion clinic fire - CBS News

Christian terrorists and Muslim terrorists are not being properly charged with terrorism.
 
#8
#8

From the article you cited:
At his arraignment, he was charged with maliciously damaging federal property and being a felon in possession of a firearm. That’s it. These are the types of charges one would expect for pushing over the street corner mailbox.

Not quite. In fact, not even close. Here is a nice reference point:
A 22-year-old western Idaho man was convicted in federal court of...conspiracy to maliciously use explosive materials, conspiracy to maliciously damage federal property and theft.

Prosecutors alleged Bolen and an accomplice, 50-year-old David Joseph Vonbargen of Fruitland, used Molotov cocktails to destroy a U.S. Department of Agriculture truck and all-terrain vehicle as well as other properties.

Prosecutors say Bolen faces at least 35 years in prison.

Idaho man convicted in attack on federal property - www.kivitv.com

If Aldosary gets 20-35 years in the pen, will you and GS think that justice was served? Or, will you only think justice was served if he gets 20-35 years AND the charges are given the name of terrorism?

Why are you so caught up on the word (a word that is not being used in reference to terrorist attacks on abortion clinics, by the way)?
 
#9
#9
link to any reputable site claiming "political sensitivities"?

Too politically sensitive for 'reputable sites.'

It's laughable to call lame stream media reputable anymore. At least as far as I'm concerned and the majority of the America eople fell as I do.








Interesting consistency here:

Christian terrorists and Muslim terrorists are not being properly charged with terrorism.

Except the media doesn't use words such a moslem, islamo/fascism, islamic jihad, or country of origin, etc etc etc.

If you didn't know better you would think it was just workplace violence and not islamic jihad.







From the article you cited:


Not quite. In fact, not even close. Here is a nice reference point:


If Aldosary gets 20-35 years in the pen, will you and GS think that justice was served? Or, will you only think justice was served if he gets 20-35 years AND the charges are given the name of terrorism?

Why are you so caught up on the word (a word that is not being used in reference to terrorist attacks on abortion clinics, by the way)?



This Aldawsari?


Texas: Stopping a Jihadi bomber Who was One Chemical Away from Building a Bomb - Atlas Shrugs

The 20-year-old Saudi Arabian man living in Lubbock, Texas was intent on waging jihad against Americans—possibly even a former U.S. president—and he was one ingredient away from being able to build a powerful bomb.

But Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari’s deadly plans began to unravel when a shipping company’s suspicions were raised—illustrating once again how the FBI relies on private industry and the general public in the fight against terror.
-----------------------

In a matter of days, members of our North Texas Joint Terrorism Task Force learned that although Aldawsari had once been a chemical engineering student at Texas Tech, he was no longer enrolled there and had no affiliation with the university.

“He was trying to pass himself off as a Texas Tech student doing research on cleaning products,” said Special Agent Mike Orndorff, who worked the investigation. “Those credentials, if legitimate, would have allowed him to buy the phenol.”

Most alarming was that Aldawsari had already purchased the two other chemicals needed to make his bomb, along with test tubes, beakers, and protective gear. Through covert operations, investigators learned he had disassembled clocks and cell phones and stripped the wires off Christmas lights in apparent attempts to fashion timers and initiating devices.
------------------------

The investigation revealed troubling things about Aldawsari, who had come to the U.S. legally in 2008 on a student visa. “Based on evidence from the Internet and his journal entries,” Thompson said, “Aldawsari was radicalized before he ever came to the U.S. It appears he started planning this attack when he was a teenager and sought a scholarship to study specifically in America.”

So when he dropped out of school, why wasn't his visa revoked?

He got life but we will keep him up while he uses the prison system to try to convert and radicalize other prisoners to perform violent jihad here in America.

I'm not at all happy with the term war on terror, sounds like war on drugs and war on poverty and we know how those are going.

I would (off the top of my head if I were the one determining the language to be used) perfer something like peaceful action to prevent violent jihad.
 
#10
#10
From the article you cited:


Not quite. In fact, not even close. Here is a nice reference point:


If Aldosary gets 20-35 years in the pen, will you and GS think that justice was served? Or, will you only think justice was served if he gets 20-35 years AND the charges are given the name of terrorism?

Why are you so caught up on the word (a word that is not being used in reference to terrorist attacks on abortion clinics, by the way)?

Just call it what it is and report it as such ...... What are they afraid of?
 
#11
#11
Just call it what it is and report it as such ...... What are they afraid of?

It is arson and it is the malicious damaging of property.

This is the standard charge for such acts, whether it be an attack on the Social Security Administration Building or an attack on an abortion clinic.

I am not opposed to calling these acts terrorism and charging them as such; however, it is not as if the Federal Government is being overtly and unfairly sensitive to Muslims, when they are also not charging abortion clinic attackers with terrorism.
 
#12
#12
http://www.volnation.com/forum/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=7928187

All people that work for the Obama Administration are wimps & lazy people that don't do there job for the average American citizen. These fools that keep this man in Office of President will wake up to the truth one day & say "I'm tired of being raped constantly by this clown & the people that work for him." They cash their check at the end of the week & sleep good at night not caring one iota about this great country or the people that live in it. They defend the Radical Islamist & are scared of what they may do. Obama has no balls to keep any promise he makes cause he knows that lying & being deceitful is his main game. They figure out a way each day to bring the country down & to break our spirits for the love of country & to our fellow man. Obama is one sick dude who really needs to get some help with the old brain that's suppose to be in that fat head of his. Spending more money we don't have will not solve the problem of unemployment or jump start the economy. What an idiot.

madhat2.jpg

mad_hatter_watermarked_thumb%25255B11%25255D.png









It is arson and it is the malicious damaging of property.

This is the standard charge for such acts, whether it be an attack on the Social Security Administration Building or an attack on an abortion clinic.

I am not opposed to calling these acts terrorism and charging them as such; however, it is not as if the Federal Government is being overtly and unfairly sensitive to Muslims, when they are also not charging abortion clinic attackers with terrorism.

Major Hasan gets to keep his beard. That’s Good. | danmillerinpanama

The court martial of Army Major Nidal Hasan, who murdered thirteen people at Fort Hood, Texas in 2009 and wounded thirty-two others while screaming Allah Akbar, has dragged on too long.
----------------------

The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which sits in Washington, D.C., said in its 10-page opinion that because of a variety of factors, a reasonable person “would harbor doubts about the military judge’s impartiality.” The court did not say that the trial judge was actually biased, officials noted, but instead ordered the removal for the appearance of bias. The court also set aside the six previous contempt convictions against Hasan, who has refused orders from Gross to shave his beard and conform with Army grooming standards in the courtroom, though it did not issue a ruling on whether Hasan has a right to wear his beard under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
----------------------------------

He apparently did not discover his Islamic obligation to grow a beard until after his court martial had begun.
---------------------------

If during his next court appearance Major Hasan wears a tutu, Michael Jackson moon boots and a head cover of the sort women are required to wear in Islamist places, the court martial should ignore the attempt at intentionally farcical insults and proceed with the trial.
--------------------------

A female military judge, Colonel Tara A. Osborn, has been designated as Colonel Gross' replacement. That may generate grounds for further delay, disruption and eventually appeal from a conviction. Those grounds may be no less specious than those that resulted in the replacement of Colonel Gross. Whether they are specious or valid matters little because in either event the trial may be delayed and disrupted further and the appeal further protracted. Here are two thoughts:

? Might the designation of a female military judge to preside over the trial of an Islamist male be deemed evidence of prejudice? Arguments to that effect could be made.

? If those arguments are rejected, must Colonel Osborn's head be covered in Islamist fashion during the trial so as not to offend Major Hasan's sense of Islamist decency? Would a failure to do that be deemed evidence of prejudice? Stranger things have happened.

maj-hasan-with-beard.jpg


Keep the beard, lose the heartbeat filthy pig.

You know I was reading Helen's helpful hints in the Sunday paper and #17 caught my eye, it read; 'if you find yourself in the workplace and here someone shouting alahu ackbar, hit the deck and chamber a round if you've got one, violence is soon to follow.'


PS; Did you delete that pic yet?
 
#13
#13
Just call it what it is and report it as such ...... What are they afraid of?

Evidently they are afraid to reveal that the religion of peace is anything BUT a religion of peace.

Countires with the most terrorism currently = Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, Yemen, Somalia and Nigeria.

What does the terrorism in those countries all have in common?

If anyone guessed a high per capita population of moslems and them following the teachings of the koran to perform violent jihad to advance the cause of islam, you're pretty close to the truth.

You will hear some say it's caused by poverty, competition for land and resources but when they say that they are just deflecting from the true cause of such strife.

Of course the media is hell bent to smooth this over and cover at all costs the true picture and substitute their own creation of reality.

Global media conceals fact that soccer players who beat Dutch referee to death were Muslims - Jihad Watch

Then after leaving out the fact that these 'youths' are moslems, and this is repeated daily, especially in Europe, they will, if not just referring to such activity as workplace violence, they will claim that only radicalized moslems really advocate for violence.

A list of the most influential moslems in ther world reveals that 7 of top 10 are islamists and who knows if the other two aren't closet islamists?

December is Hatred and Violence in the Qur'an Awareness Month - Atlas Shrugs

Robert Spencer has started an illuminating new daily series at Jihad Watch: Hatred and Violence in the Qur'an Awareness Month. Running through the month of December, it was inspired by the Pat Condell video above, which utterly destroys the trumped-up and manipulative propaganda concept of "Islamophobia Awareness Month." Toward the end of the video, Condell says that a Hatred and Violence in the Qur'an Awareness Month would be much more appropriate, and Robert took him up on it.

Spencer explains: "After all, November was Islamophobia Awareness Month, and certainly the hatred and violence in the Qur'an kills many, many more people than 'Islamophobia' ever has or ever will, and so it is far more deserving than 'Islamophobia' of a month of its own."

Why do some Muslims hate pre-Islamic art with such frenzied intensity that they would destroy it, despite its historical and archaeological value? Why did the Taliban blow up the Buddhas of Bamiyan, and why do some Islamic supremacists in Egypt today want to do the same thing to the Sphinx and the Pyramids?

It isn't just because they are artifacts of a religion that Islam rejects as false and idolatrous, although that is a large part of it. It is also because the Qur'an says that the ruins are a sign of Allah's punishment of those who rejected his truth:

Many were the Ways of Life that have passed away before you: travel through the earth, and see what was the end of those who rejected Truth. (Qur'an 3:137)

This is one of the foundations of the Islamic idea that pre-Islamic civilizations, and non-Islamic civilizations, are all jahiliyya – the society of unbelievers, which is worthless. Obviously this cuts against the idea of archaeological preservation. V. S. Naipaul encountered this attitude in his travels through Muslim countries. For many Muslims, he observed in Among the Believers, “The time before Islam is a time of blackness: that is part of Muslim theology. History has to serve theology.” Naipaul recounted that some Pakistani Muslims, far from valuing the nation’s renowned archaeological site at Mohenjo Daro, saw its ruins as a teaching opportunity for Islam, recommending that Qur’an 3:137 be posted there as a teaching tool.

Their hatred for their own heritage and past was a point of pride for them, inculcated by the Qur'an.

Notice how often you see posts denegrating our own American heritage, especially the Christian part of it and then too that is ofetn followed by the Christianity = Islam, they are mostly the same and after all they are both religions which is nothing more than ignorant human superstition.

Pity the fool.
 
#14
#14
It is arson and it is the malicious damaging of property.

This is the standard charge for such acts, whether it be an attack on the Social Security Administration Building or an attack on an abortion clinic.

Beating up a man is just that assault..This SHOULD be the standard charge for all such acts, whether it be an attack on a person over a pool game..or an attack on a gay man

So why does the assault(beating up) on the gay get the up charge of a hate crime?
 
#15
#15
Violence by a moslem, even if he is screaming alahu ackbar, is construed to be workplace violence,
but workplace violence isn't terrorism.

Workplace violence can be called a hate crime,
but only if a moslem is the victim.
 
#16
#16
Beating up a man is just that assault..This SHOULD be the standard charge for all such acts, whether it be an attack on a person over a pool game..or an attack on a gay man

So why does the assault(beating up) on the gay get the up charge of a hate crime?

I have no idea why it should be charged as a hate crime instead of simply assault.
 

VN Store



Back
Top