 | | 
05-23-2012, 07:37 AM
|
#61 (permalink)
| | Wave yo hands in the aiya
| Quote:
Originally Posted by therealUT  Hawaii provides proof to Arizona. What angle will the birthers take now? | proof? | 
|   | |
05-23-2012, 07:45 AM
|
#62 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011 
Posts: 185
Likes: 20
| Quote:
Originally Posted by therealUT Hawaii provides proof to Arizona. | Sheriff Joe gets the goods. | |
| | |
05-23-2012, 07:49 AM
|
#63 (permalink)
| | Rational Thought Allowed?
| Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPapaVol proof? | Thanks for letting me know the angle that the birthers will take.
__________________
LG, when I think of UT football I think about world class sprinter WR's, like Gault,...fast bruising hard to tackle RB's, great OL play and a D that'll knock your d**k in the dirt. That's from the Johnny Major era thru the Philip Fulmer era.--HIGHTIDE 25 APR
Nam esse vitium et non nocere non potest | 
| | |
05-23-2012, 08:14 AM
|
#64 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 7,516
Likes: 1,699
| The Birthers can not be very smart.
This was a failed issue the moment it started.
There is too much money involved in politics. The opposition will dig up everything there is on a candidate.
There is no way he could go through the dem primaries against the Clintons, then the general with the GOP searching for anything that would discredit him.
A little common sense helps at times. That is something fewer people are using these days. | |
| | |
05-23-2012, 08:16 AM
|
#65 (permalink)
| | Wave yo hands in the aiya
| Quote:
Originally Posted by therealUT Thanks for letting me know the angle that the birthers will take. | You misunderstood. I asked what qualifies it as proof. The fact that someone in HI said it is? Skepticism is the watchword in this issue and it should apply to both sides. | |
| | |
05-23-2012, 08:23 AM
|
#66 (permalink)
| | Rational Thought Allowed?
| Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPapaVol You misunderstood. I asked what qualifies it as proof. The fact that someone in HI said it is? Skepticism is the watchword in this issue and it should apply to both sides. | Why do you presume guilt? The burden of proof is on those making the allegations, not on the person defending themselves.
The fact is, that no one will ever be able to demonstratively prove where Obama was born (nor where you were born). Yet, the State of Hawaii is making an official proclamation that they have some sort of official verification of his birth in Hawaii. What more do you want?
__________________
LG, when I think of UT football I think about world class sprinter WR's, like Gault,...fast bruising hard to tackle RB's, great OL play and a D that'll knock your d**k in the dirt. That's from the Johnny Major era thru the Philip Fulmer era.--HIGHTIDE 25 APR
Nam esse vitium et non nocere non potest | |
| | |
05-23-2012, 11:33 AM
|
#67 (permalink)
| | Discombobulated
Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Denver-bound
Posts: 5,499
Likes: 550
| Duh, proof. | |
| | |
05-23-2012, 12:19 PM
|
#68 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
| The birthers do not want to believe that Obama was born in Hawaii. At a minimum, they want to keep the issue alive for political purposes.
Therefore, no matter what evidence, or certifications from Hawaii, might be forthcoming, they will reject it as insufficient.
Therefore, Obama has always been correct to ignore the issue - no matter what proof is produced, it will never be good enough. | |
| | |
05-23-2012, 12:47 PM
|
#69 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 185
Likes: 20
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lawgator1 The birthers do not want to believe that Obama was born in Hawaii. At a minimum, they want to keep the issue alive for political purposes. | Actually keeping it alive for political purposes is what Obama has been doing for the last four years but once Sheriff Joe's posse arrived in Hawaii ... game over. | |
| | |
05-24-2012, 01:16 AM
|
#70 (permalink)
| | VNFL
Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 234
| Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPapaVol that's only of any value whatsoever when the policy is on display, as opposed to simple talk about said policy. In the absence of evidence, character is what you're left with. | Reason why I'll vote for the President in 2012 - and I voted against him in 2008. | |
| | |
05-25-2012, 12:17 PM
|
#72 (permalink)
| | ಠ_ಠ
Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Virginia Military District
Posts: 29,231
Likes: 5,092
| It's all very fishy, IMO | |
| | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | | |
 | |
Forums |
