1988 users online now!    CONTACT US | ADVERTISE | REGISTER       

About this Page -- This is a discussion on TransCanada seizing private land in Texas for pipeline, claims eminent domain. within the forum Politics. Despite not having an approved permit to construct its proposed Keystone XL Pipeline, TransCanada is moving forward in development along ...

Go Back   VolNation > Off Topic Forums > Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-23-2012, 11:21 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Abe Hoffman's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: K-Town
Posts: 467
Likes: 96
TransCanada seizing private land in Texas for pipeline, claims eminent domain

Despite not having an approved permit to construct its proposed Keystone XL Pipeline, TransCanada is moving forward in development along the southern leg.

The company is seizing private property for pipeline development, claiming eminent domain, and are drawing controversy from landowners in Texas as well as environmentalists.

TransCanada seizing private land in Texas for pipeline, claims eminent domain | PRI.ORG
Abe Hoffman is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-23-2012, 11:26 AM   #2 (permalink)
VN's Propaganda Minister
 
Burhead's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 9,691
Likes: 770
Those bloody Canadians, time to invade!
Burhead is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-23-2012, 11:31 AM   #3 (permalink)
doo doo doo
 
volinbham's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: looking out my backdoor
Posts: 31,965
Likes: 1,467
Wait a minute, a Canadian private company is exercising eminent domain? I believe that story is missing some important pieces of information.
__________________
"Every American has the right to know when their government believes it has the right to kill them"

--Sen. Ron Wyden (D) Oregon
volinbham is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-23-2012, 11:49 AM   #4 (permalink)
smh
 
milohimself's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 47,597
Likes: 1,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by volinbham View Post
Wait a minute, a Canadian private company is exercising eminent domain? I believe that story is missing some important pieces of information.
Have a read: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/18/us...pagewanted=all
milohimself is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-23-2012, 12:01 PM   #5 (permalink)
doo doo doo
 
volinbham's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: looking out my backdoor
Posts: 31,965
Likes: 1,467
Quote:
Originally Posted by milohimself View Post
My point was that a private company cannot seize land. They must have government approval to seize the land. TC is seizing nothing and is not exercising ED. They may request ED laws be used to obtain the land but that is a government process.
__________________
"Every American has the right to know when their government believes it has the right to kill them"

--Sen. Ron Wyden (D) Oregon
volinbham is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-23-2012, 12:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Abe Hoffman's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: K-Town
Posts: 467
Likes: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by volinbham View Post
My point was that a private company cannot seize land. They must have government approval to seize the land. TC is seizing nothing and is not exercising ED. They may request ED laws be used to obtain the land but that is a government process.
TransCanada is classified as a "Public Utility" and can thus utilize eminent domain same as Duke Power, TVA, American Electric Power and many others.
Abe Hoffman is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-23-2012, 12:22 PM   #7 (permalink)
Short Sided
 
n_huffhines's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,008
Likes: 876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abe Hoffman View Post
TransCanada is classified as a "Public Utility" and can thus utilize eminent domain same as Duke Power, TVA, American Electric Power and many others.
But the point is they can't do it without government. Government is the one actually seizing the land for one of their preferred enterprises.
__________________
n_huffhines is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-23-2012, 12:23 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
lawgator1's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winter Springs, Fla.
Posts: 29,691
Likes: 2,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abe Hoffman View Post
TransCanada is classified as a "Public Utility" and can thus utilize eminent domain same as Duke Power, TVA, American Electric Power and many others.

How can a foreign corporation, even if classified as a utility, use ED for American property?
lawgator1 is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-23-2012, 12:33 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Abe Hoffman's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: K-Town
Posts: 467
Likes: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawgator1 View Post
How can a foreign corporation, even if classified as a utility, use ED for American property?
Apparently they have a US registered subsidiary.
Abe Hoffman is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-23-2012, 12:56 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 14,183
Likes: 298
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burhead View Post
Those bloody Canadians, time to invade!


Funny thing, back in the '60s the media asked USAF Gen Crutis LeMay, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff what he thought of the B-58 bomber and he replied it would be a great bomber if we were going to war with Canada and all the Canadians I met back in that day were fearful we were going to invade Canada.
gsvol is offline   Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-23-2012, 01:10 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Thrasher865's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 27,783
Likes: 2,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsvol View Post


Funny thing, back in the '60s the media asked USAF Gen Crutis LeMay, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff what he thought of the B-58 bomber and he replied it would be a great bomber if we were going to war with Canada and all the Canadians I met back in that day were fearful we were going to invade Canada.
HAHAAHAHAHAA look guys, Obama's pants are on fire, and he has biiiiig ears!!!!!

So funny!!

Thrasher865 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-23-2012, 01:23 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,583
Likes: 421
Landowners get like $500 per piece of pipe put on their land. It comes out to around $2500 per acre, per pipeline Pretty fair for texas farmland
VolsNSkinsFan is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-23-2012, 07:25 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Abe Hoffman's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: K-Town
Posts: 467
Likes: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by VolsNSkinsFan View Post
Landowners get like $500 per piece of pipe put on their land. It comes out to around $2500 per acre, per pipeline Pretty fair for texas farmland

Would you sell or give up the rights to your property for that amount?
Abe Hoffman is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-24-2012, 09:56 AM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,583
Likes: 421
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abe Hoffman View Post
Would you sell or give up the rights to your property for that amount?
For farmland in Texas? Yes I would, no brainer
VolsNSkinsFan is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27