1407 users online now!    CONTACT US | ADVERTISE | REGISTER       

About this Page -- This is a discussion on 200,000 Warrant-less Searches. within the forum Politics. Rand Paul ineffectively arguing for civil liberties, for rule of law, and against the PATRIOT Act. 200,000 Warrant-less Searches on ...

Go Back   VolNation > Off Topic Forums > Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-31-2011, 02:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
Short Sided
 
n_huffhines's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 22,231
Likes: 2,555
200,000 Warrant-less Searches

Rand Paul ineffectively arguing for civil liberties, for rule of law, and against the PATRIOT Act.

200,000 Warrant-less Searches on US Citizens This Year | Libertarian News
__________________
n_huffhines is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-31-2011, 06:20 PM   #2 (permalink)
tim
Volsquatch
 
tim's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,631
Likes: 4,032
Darn.
tim is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-31-2011, 06:22 PM   #3 (permalink)
Rational Thought Allowed?
 
therealUT's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brookside, KC
Posts: 27,262
Likes: 3,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by nbakerld View Post
Rand Paul ineffectively arguing for civil liberties, for rule of law, and against the PATRIOT Act.

200,000 Warrant-less Searches on US Citizens This Year | Libertarian News
Quote:
Originally Posted by tim View Post
Darn.
Problem is, Baker, that it's not 1791 anymore; therefore, the Fourth Amendment is not relevant.
__________________
"It is vain to object that life and reality are not logical. Life and reality are neither logical nor illogical; they are simply given. But logic is the only tool available to man for the comprehension of both." - LvM
therealUT is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-31-2011, 06:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
tim
Volsquatch
 
tim's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,631
Likes: 4,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by therealUT View Post
Problem is, Baker, that it's not 1791 anymore; therefore, the Fourth Amendment is not relevant.
Maybe we are just developing.
tim is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 06-01-2011, 09:58 AM   #5 (permalink)
Short Sided
 
n_huffhines's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 22,231
Likes: 2,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by therealUT View Post
Problem is, Baker, that it's not 1791 anymore; therefore, the Fourth Amendment is not relevant.
Is this a statement on the reality we live in, or your opinion of what's right and proper?
__________________
n_huffhines is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 06-01-2011, 10:15 AM   #6 (permalink)
SDV
Senior Member
 
SDV's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 21,838
Likes: 9,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by therealUT View Post
Problem is, Baker, that it's not 1791 anymore; therefore, the Fourth Amendment is not relevant.
Hope u are being sarcastic
Posted via VolNation Mobile
SDV is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 06-01-2011, 11:05 AM   #7 (permalink)
Rational Thought Allowed?
 
therealUT's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brookside, KC
Posts: 27,262
Likes: 3,550
Sarcasm.
__________________
"It is vain to object that life and reality are not logical. Life and reality are neither logical nor illogical; they are simply given. But logic is the only tool available to man for the comprehension of both." - LvM
therealUT is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 06-01-2011, 11:44 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 10,402
Likes: 2
So what is the line of what is allowable versus what isn't?
tigervol9802 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27