Indoctrinating American school children with moslim viewpoint.

#4
#4
Calling ACLG a crazy lunatic is an insult to moonbats the world over.

American Thinker: Islamist Gülen Movement Runs U.S. Charter Schools

A secretive foreign network of Islamic radicals now operates dozens of charter schools -- which receive government money but are not required to adopt a state-approved curriculum -- on U.S. soil. The inspirer of this conspiratorial effort is Fethullah Gülen, who directs a major Islamist movement in Turkey and the Turkish Diaspora but lives in the United States.
----------------------

........... in startling news for Americans, the Gülen movement operates more than 85 primary and secondary schools on our soil. A roster of the Gülen schools and of the numerous foundations that support them has been released to the public by the patriotic group Act! for America. The Gülen schools are often designated as "science academies" and are concentrated in Texas, Ohio, and California -- with others scattered across the rest of the country.


Two states that host Gülen charter schools are Arizona and Utah. In the former, the Daisy Education Corporation (the Gülen movement loves friendly-sounding institutional names) operates three schools in Tucson: one serving kindergarten through the eighth grade, another designated as an elementary school, and a middle-high school, all under the rubric of the Sonoran Science Academy. In Phoenix, it runs a satellite kindergarten-to-10th-grade campus with the same name.
 
#7
#7
Goggles and the Sky Hook baby. gs had his jersey when he was lew alcindor.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

yup and then he started indoctrinating american school children with his muslim viewpoint and his love of history. evil man clearly.
 
#8
#8
From and internet message board poster;

The Infestation Grows

By “Overwatcher”

The Moslim infestation of America is growing, spreading with epidemic quickness and proportions, almost unchecked. This is a time to know and understand the problem, not to ignore it and hope it will go away. The creeping cancer simply cannot and will not simply “coexist” alongside the American way of life, the American culture, the American greatness.

First of all, In Arabic Islam does not mean “peace.” Salaam means “peace.” Islam means “Submit!” Furthermore, there are only three permissible ways for a non-believer, that is, an infidel, to submit: 1.) Convert to Islam. 2.) Continue as a second class citizen subject to the whims of Moslims, and paying protection money (Jizzya) on demand. 3.) Die. I don’t like any of those choices. Do you?

A Moslim is an adherent of Islam, one who embraces its teachings and doctrines. There is no such thing as a “moderate” Moslim – it is a myth, made up to placate stupid, politically correct wannabes, that is to say, “multicultural” imbeciles. Is there such a thing as being just a little bit pregnant? Either you are, or you are not. It’s the same thing – either you are a Moslim or you are not.

A Moslim’s supreme governing law is Sharia’ Law, Islamic Law. In America the supreme law of the land is the United States Constitution. Sharia’ Law is at odds with our Constitution. Moslims are here not to embrace and adopt the supreme law of this land; they are here to supplant it with their own supreme law - pure and simple. Andrew Whitehead, courageous patriot, on his website, *Anti-CAIR* Defending America from the Council on American-Islamic Relations, has posted a quote by the Co-founder of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, Omar Ahmad: “Those who stay in America should be open to society without melting, keeping Mosques open so anyone can come and learn about Islam. If you choose to live here, you have a responsibility to deliver the message of Islam ... Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faiths, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Moslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” What further need have we of witnesses?

The United States Constitution and Sharia’ Law are mutually exclusive. They cannot both exist in the same place at the same time. One or the other must go. Make no mistake about it, Moslims in America are actively working to ensure their system is the one that becomes and remains operational in this great land of the (formerly?) brave and free. Perhaps, still brave, but will we remain free of this plague that seeks to overrun this land? No, we will be overcome if we do not recognize what is going on, face up to what is going on, and deal with it decisively. No matter what our delusional “leaders” may say in our overbloated federal government (as Ted Nugent calls it, “Fedzilla”), this is a warfare. Maybe not a shooting one yet ...

America has always welcomed legal immigration. People have come here from every country on earth, and they have embraced and adopted their new land where they are free to be all they can be. They have become Americans and have contributed marvelously to this nation’s greatness. However, Moslims come here not to assimilate, (see Omar’s quote again) but to infect and infest. As Andrew McCarthy has explained in his book, The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America, Muslims have adopted a “voluntary apartheid,” whereby they purposely do not integrate into American society. They adroitly exploit our system of laws in order to thwart us and to gain advantage after “politically correct” advantage, after every “multicultural” nonsensical advantage they can dream up. It is truly an infestation we are witnessing. But, is it not astounding that we are allowing it to happen right here and right under our very noses? This is especially disturbing after watching it happen all throughout Europe, (soon becoming Eurabia), especially in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Sweden, and France. There are numerous “no go” areas in those lands where the police and fire personnel are afraid to venture, because control there is in the hands of the immigrant “youths.”

According to a comment made on the Atlas Shrugs website at Atlas Shrugs “It looks like the French government may have to update their official websites to include more than the following: French in France can’t go to 751 areas designated Muslim-Only areas. Note: The French are kind enough to list the areas, as well as provide detailed maps, of where non-Moslims mustn’t go in France.” I guess France truly doesn’t belong to the French any longer, as it appears the French have surrendered once again. Unfortunately, similar areas are presently developing and festering throughout the United States. Armed Moslim enclaves exist in many localities across the country. One example is “Islam(a)berg,” near Buffalo, New York. There are many, many more compounds strategically developing across the land. (Nay, I wear not the hat of tinfoil. I just have eyes to see, and ears to hear.).

This terribly dangerous condition I am trying to describe is rapidly approaching “super nova” status. Let me preface the danger with a few facts. Saul Alinsky wrote the infamous Rules for Radicals in 1971. Alinsky was a communist through and through, and much worse. He taught his armies of community organizers to go forth into the various neighborhoods across America and to organize the people in order to divide them and cause them to serve “the greater good.” Unfortunately one of Saul’s greatest disciples is the “present” President of the United States, Barak Hussein Obama. This is the one who most frequently voted “present” as a United States Senator from Illinois, which essentially meant that he was not doing his job. As a U.S. Senator he also, quite probably in violation of the Logan Act, (as McCarthy also mentions in his book on jihad), spent quite a bit of time “in his native Kenya,” actively and aggressively working on behalf of Obinga Odinga, (Ramma Lamma Dinga). He was actively organizing the Kenyan communities, but clearly along the lines of and consistent with an anti-United States agenda. This was not lawful activity for an official of the United States government. Of course, the Obama-worshipping incompetents who call themselves mainstream media journalists gave “the One” a free pass, and didn’t deem it newsworthy enough to report his shenanigans dutifully to the American people. To do so would have been contrary to their constant practice of slobbering all over him, gushing forth with his greatness. “Hope and Change.”

I truly do not know if Barak Hussein Obama is a Moslim, and a non-natural born United States citizen who is illegally occupying the Oval Office. His own wife, Michelle, has stated publicly that Barak’s native country is Kenya. Why would she make a statement like that if it weren’t true? I don’t know. We have seen pictures of him outfitted in his native Moslim dress. He attended Moslim schools in Indonesia, the most populous Moslim country on earth. He stated to an Egyptian official in a one-on-one meeting that he is indeed a Moslim. His father was unquestionably a Moslim, which according to Islamic Law meant the male child was also a Moslim. His school records from Indonesia indicate his religion as Moslim. Obama has publicly stated that the most beautiful sound on earth is the Moslim call to prayer. Why did he bow down to Saudi Arabian royalty? Question after question. What is the truth in this matter?

This might possibly explain why it is now the official policy of the United States government, and all its far reaching, ever-expanding bureaucratic tentacles, not to mention the term Islamic terror or Islamic terrorists or Islamic terrorism. It is no longer the War on Terror – it is the war on “man-caused disasters.” We must not speak ill of Islam, but we must praise its numerous cultural and scientific achievements and accomplishments. Why, even our own NASA has been charged with bringing a space program to the Moslim world and to extol the wondrous virtues of Islam.

This president treats our stated enemies much better than he treats our all-time greatest ally, the Nation of Israel. He bows to our enemies and betrays our friends. No wonder it looks hopeless. The willful, deliberate failure of our federal government to protect our borders is a disgrace – and a “clear and present danger” to our security and well-being. It appears that Hezbollah is now assisting the Mexican drug cartels in their latest string of car bombings in Juarez. This is a direct dereliction of duty on the part of the United States Chief Executive Officer, the Commander in Chief. It is a violation of his oath of office by which he swore to uphold and to defend the Constitution of the United States of America. This blatant failure is an impeachable offense, and should be brought to bear immediately. If you are not even allowed to name the name of the enemy, you are doomed. You have lost. This is the terrible danger I fear. “The One” who loves Moslims so much won’t allow us to name Islam as the enemy. What does that tell you about him?

It’s time to call in the exterminator. (We can’t call in the terminator – we see how much help he has been to the troubled state of “Kaleefohniya”). Make these vermin leave voluntarily, or involuntarily. But, leave they must. Of course, a “bleeding heart” liberal type would probably try and argue that we should allow them to remain if they swear allegiance to the United States Constitution (not that a liberal gives a damn about the U.S. Constitution). But, there are two problems with this approach: 1.) A true Muslim cannot subject or subordinate Islamic Law, Sharia’ Law, to anything else on earth. So, this would therefore require a Muslim to renounce Islam. We know what the penalty for that is (it rhymes with, “I will cut your head off”). 2.) The widespread, common Islamic practice of Al Taqqiyyah, which is lying or swearing falsely, just to further the cause of Islam. So, if a true Moslim were to swear allegiance to the United States and its Constitution, it would be, ipso facto, a lie! Remember the principle of mutual exclusivity. Moslims don’t assimilate. They encroach. They are encroachers. There is no such thing as a moderate Moslim except in the eye of an uninformed, wishful-thinking, politically correct, multicultural liberal-minded public. The moderate Moslim exists in the land of the tooth fairy and assorted other fairies.

The danger I am trying to emphasize can be illustrated by a line from an old Bella Lugosi “Dracula” movie from the late 1930s. In the film, Professor Von Helsing stated that, “The greatest strength of the vampire lies in the fact that so few people believe he exists.” (No, I don’t believe in vampires; I’m just trying to illustrate a point). The greatest strength of the “moderate” Moslim is that so many people want to believe he exists. He doesn’t exist. Believe me. Your life is at stake! Wake up. Let us put out the evil from among us!

Lt. Col. Dave Grossman wrote that there are sheep – and it’s okay to be a sheep; just recognize that you are a sheep. Then there are wolves that come to tear and destroy the sheep. And, there are sheepdogs who seek to warn and protect the sheep. The sheepdog is always on the lookout for wolves. He is not afraid to defend the sheep. From his Killology Research Group, A Warrior Science Group: Lieutenant Colonel Dave Grossman, Author - Jonesboro, Arkansas website, an article “On Sheep, Wolves and Sheepdogs,” (From the book, On Combat, by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman).

It’s okay to be a sheep, but remember that wolves love sheep. Also keep in mind that the sheepdog can’t be everywhere.

In the case of another Islamic attack upon these United States of America,
apply “Insecticide” liberally at: 21 25’14.14”N 39 49’45.23”E elev.318m
 
#9
#9
yup and then he started indoctrinating american school children with his muslim viewpoint and his love of history. evil man clearly.

Don't discount Cassius Clay's influence. He even refused induction.... Plus, all that hitting of infidels promoted violence on unprecedented levels. (Tongue in cheek)
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#11
#11
Cliff notes for thread .....


Moslims bad.


You're welcome.

fyp

Congratulations proving once again that even a blind hog can occassionally come up with an acorn.


If one wants to see what Islam offers, look at Lebanon. It was once the jewel of the Middle East. A majority Christian nation, encompassing tolerance for Jews, Eastern Orthodox, Coptic, and Islam to name a few. The Moslims attacked to stop the “cleansing” and like magic, no intolerance towards Muslims....Of course there are no others tolerated there BUT Moslims.

And since you hate Reagan you can lay a lot of the blame at his feet since he didn't retaliate when our embassy was bombed, our peacekeeping Marines killed while sleeping in their barracks and our CIA station chief hung and the scene published via the internet.

And you can blame Bush too since he went along with the recognition of Kosovo as a seperate country.

The Profound Problem of Muslim Immigration | World Opinion and Editorial Right Side News

Modern Day Trojan Horse: Al-Hijra by Sam Solomon and E Al Maquisi

As the West has accepted extensive immigration from Islamic countries, unexpected social and political problems have followed. While rising crime rates, rampant unemployment and a heavy load on our much-appreciated welfare systems are severe problems in itself, a distinct and dramatically more significant problem is the subtle subversion of our free and democratic societies, also known as "Stealth Jihad"[/B]
.

The retired Islamic scholar Sam Solomon, in this compact book "Al-Hijra, The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration", connects the dots and explains why seemingly unrelated incidents are in fact rooted in Islamic tradition and are steps on the path to create a fully Islamized society.

To demonstrate how this functions, Sam Solomon dives into his exhaustive knowledge of Islamic history and law. As Islamic scholars everywhere, he derives his conclusions from Islamic scripture, the life of Muhammad in particular, and shows how historically immigration has slowly but steadily lead to formerly Jewish or Christian societies submitting to Islam. The primary example in the book is Muhammads takeover of Yathrib, today known as Medina, and how the concepts and strategies developed for the conquest of a relatively insignificant Arab city are being duplicated by Islamic leaders worldwide, with the same goal: Expanding Islamic conquest ever further.

The depth of knowledge and connections described in Al-Hijra constitute both a strength and a weakness. Most important is the strength: Sam Solomon uses his Islamic scholarship to reveal the justifications and machinations being applied to undermine and attack the very notion of a secular society. This is important information that everyone involved in these matters deserve to have.

The weakness is that the book frequently becomes hard to follow. Understanding Islamic terms like Darura (necessity), Takweem (empowerment), I'dad (readying) etcetera are important in order to counter the undercurrent of Islamization, yet the denseness of the presentation makes the lines of thought hard to follow for the unprepared. One does well in having some knowledge of Islamic thought before reading Al-Hijra.

That said, this book is indispensable for a very simple reason: It presents information otherwise not available to the uninitiated Westerner, and mercilessly reveals the twisted logic of Islamist activists, their justifications, methods and ultimate goal: A fully Shariah-compliant society. By pointing out the scriptural justifications and inner logic of seemingly benign and unrelated Muslim demands, it provides an invaluable tool for identifying and countering the stealth jihad destabilizing our societies. Dismantling this threat peacefully requires knowledge as provided by Sam Solomon.
---------------------------------

First up is the book cover: A wooden horse associates directly to the Trojan Horse, the stratagem that according to legend was applied by the Greeks to finally conquer the city of Troy. The use of this archetypical image is sure to evoke emotional responses by many, but it also points to an important fact:

The subversion against our societies is executed by relatively few immigrants. Most immigrants from Islamic countries do not come to the West in order tor transform free Western countries into semblances of the autocracies or theocracies they have fled from. They seek better living conditions, employment, a better future – but they do so without the intention to change their religion, and this is where things get complicated.

Retaining faith in Islam and Islamic scholars will lead the immigrants to tacitly support the subversive aims of Islamists who have also come to the West, initially as a relatively small fraction of millions of Islamic immigrants. These Islamic leaders and scholars use the Islamic teachings to destroy confidence in Western democracies, and they are astonishingly effective in achieving that aim.

Explaining how this seemingly irrational development can take place requires some history. This first and foremost means the life and conduct of Muhammad, the perfect example for the pious Muslim even today. The authority of Muhammad is absolute in Islam, be it in form of Quranic commands or the examples of conduct recorded in hadith collections, known in Islam as the 'Sunna'. Hijra, immigration, was a key element in Muhammads takeover of Yathrib, today known as Medina.

Unfortunately, the concept of Hijra is not limited in time or space to 7th century Arabia. The command as given is absolute, and remains an obligation on Muslims. One of many hadith quotes Muhammad for this:

I charge you with five of what Allah has charged me with: to assemble, to listen, to obey, to immigrate and to wage Jihad for the sake of Allah.

Thus, immigration is step four out of a five step plan. Sam Solomon elaborates:

So Hijra or migration is binding on all Muslims for numerous reasons; the most important being that migration is preparatory to jihad with an aim and objective of securing victory for Islam and Muslims either in another country or generally as a community.


Those who do not desire to live in an Islamic theocracy better take heed. Over the last decade we have observed how jihad has come to the West in various forms. The most obvious is the violent, like train bombings in London and Madrid, and more recently even in immigration-friendly Sweden where a cartoon drawn by Lars Vilks has become a pretext for detonating bombs during Christmas shopping.

However, more important than the flagship violent jihad is the so-called 'Stealth Jihad', where Islamic law (Shariah) is quietly being implemented in our societies, usually in seemingly benign aspects of life, but leading to a constant affirmation of Islamic identity being more important to Muslims than honest integration in the host societies. Sam Solomon quotes extensively from scripture and interpretation, pointing out how Islam in itself constitutes a barrier to integration.

The strange concept of 'necessity'
The Islamic doctrine of 'necessity' is a strange twist in these problems. For Muslims are permitted to ignore any and all Islamic rules if 'necessity' dictates it, even to the point of openly denying his or her religion, a move also known as 'Taqiyya'. Ignoring Islamic rules regarding halal/haram (permitted/forbidden) enables Muslims to work as shop clerks handling pork and alcohol if needed to make a living.

Later, when the Islamic community feels strong enough, cases are seen where Muslim shop workers start protesting having to handle these 'unclean' items, and demand an exception due to their 'religious needs'.

Demands for gender segregated swimming halls, prayer breaks, prayer rooms and eventually mosques follow similar patterns, where items that were initially not a concern suddenly become demands voiced with strong conviction of their necessities. Employers and public institutions tend to yield to such Islamic demands, not noticing that this is a slippery slope towards implementation of Shariah.

Shariah – a totalitarian system of state
As has been pointed out by Robert R. Reilly (The Closing of the Muslim Mind) and others, Islam as a theological system has, step by step, lost the connection to Hellenic thought and ideals, respect for reason, the notion of causality (that laws of nature govern the physical world), the notion of individual responsibility, and has devolved into a Rule of Will, commonly known as 'despotism'. Instrumental in this rule is the Shariah, as established and interpreted by the Islamic clergy.

Islam today consists mainly of its legal code, the Shariah. Islamic law is derived from the life and actions of Muhammad. Codifying his life into law has been a major undertaking by Islamic scholars through the centuries, resulting in detailed manuals of conduct like Reliance of the Traveller, which describe in detail how a pious Muslim is supposed to behave. This all-regulated way of organizing a society is also known as 'totalitarian'

Totalitarianism (or totalitarian rule) is a political system where the state, usually under the control of a single political person, faction, or class, recognizes no limits to its authority and strives to regulate every aspect of public and private life wherever feasible.

The new state was to provide the “total representation of the nation and total guidance of national goals.” He described totalitarianism as a society in which the ideology of the state had influence, if not power, over most of its citizens. According to Benito Mussolini, this system politicizes everything spiritual and human:

Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.


All Western attempts at establishing a totalitarian state have failed miserably. In the Islamic Middle East, however, the religious authority of Muhammad, combined with extensive enforcement on every level of society, regulating every aspect of human behaviour is largely successful, largely due to the religious prestige associated with interpreting Islamic law accurately.

The grand ambition of Islamists is to implement this system everywhere in the world.

Now, living under a totalitarian system might sound awful. Everyone is obligated to spy on everyone else, and those most zealous in enforcing the rules are held in highest regard, with actual living circumstances in the totalitarian system not being an issue of debate, for obvious reasons. Instead, such systems have intricate pecking orders, where the top cadres get to pick on the lower cadres, who pick on ordinary citizens, who in turn need some kind of enemy to pick on. As Wafa Sultan described in her book A God Who Hates, this is very much the case in Islam.

Easing the burdens: Tay'seer and Darura
Converts to Islam face a bewildering set of rules and norms to adhere to. One might think that breaking these rules would cause the failing Muslim to effectively become an apostate, but here the doctrine of Tay'seer ('easing of burdens') comes to the rescue. If the burdens imposed by Islam are too difficult to bear, the Muslim can depend on Allah to ease the burdens of those unable to bear them, or until bearing them becomes possible.

Rejecting the lifestyle of non-Muslims is one of those difficult challenges, in particular for converts who usually would come out of a Christian or secular background, be accustomed to having a beer or a glass of wine, to women having equal rights with men, and to religion being a private matter. Changing the mindset from one of reason to one of irrational religious zeal takes great effort, and has a great potential of conflict. The application of Tay'seer permits this transition to be quite gradual, but must also be seen in light of the polar opposite, the doctrine of Darura ('need').

The doctrines of Tay'seer and Darura add up to a rather confusing whole. Muslims in principle have an obligation to live in accordance with the Shariah, but host societies who find those customs bizarre, unreasonable and wildly impractical are likely to refuse implementation of all but a few minor elements of Shariah. Sam Solomon describes this contradictory situation:

So under the darura (necessities), the forbidden becomes lawful, the exception becomes the rule and the rule as we know it is suspended until the circumstances change or the objectives are achieved. Hence this principle is applied to overcome every obstacle by Muslims in a non-Muslim country from visa regulations, to obtaining nationality of the host country, to ushering in Islamic Shariah slowly [...]


The unsettling implication of this that Muslims, at large, cannot be trusted to respect secular law, even if superficially it would appear that they do.

Be prepared: Tamkeen and I'dad
Now for something disturbing: the Islamic concepts of tamkeen and i'dad. Tamkeen ('empowerment') is the strengthening of Islamic identity (as opposed to assimilating into the host society), and is a fundamental precondition for establishing Islamic rule. Without a significant number of persons identifying with being Muslims, having faith in Islamic scripture and its interpreters, Islamic leaders would have no cadres to base their authority upon, and thus no chance to seize power and establish Islamic rule in the land.

The next step, i'dad, is the practical preparation for seizing power in the land. This means building and strengthening Islamic infrastructure in the land, building networks and making Muslims proudly display their Islamic identity in public. I'dad also constitutes the practical preparation for the final physical effort to establish Islamic rule in the land, executed by a well-prepared army of soldiers fighting in the Cause of Allah, also known as jihad. Physical fighting would be a foregone conclusion at this point. For that reason, military training and accumulating weapon stocks are natural parts of i'dad. Logically, finding weapons in mosques or other Islamic buildings is a stark sign of warning to the host societies.

A logical and practical conclusion
The main text of the book ends on page 97 with a concluding chapter so short and clear I will repeat in full. It reads:

Islam is either a religion nor a faith in a personal way, as defined and understood I the West. It is a whole encompassing political system, barged in religious outfit, addressing every aspect of the life of its adherents.

So when Muslim immigrants refuse assimilation and despise integration, it is done as a political move expressed religiously. Hence it would be in the interest of the host society and its national security to examine all requests, from a socio-political angle. For every Islamic doctrine is a political dictated aiming to establish itself by undoing the existing systems to control, rule and dominate in every area.

It must be mandatory for all immigrants, and particularly Muslim immigrants, to sign an undertaking whit in built punitive charges, that they would:

Abide by the law of the land.

Do their utmost to be integrated and assimilated with the host society.

Regard religion as a personal matter of free will and choice.

Embrace the equality of genders in all aspects.

Regard and treat the discriminatory and violent doctrines and teachings of the Shariah as inapplicable and ineffective for today.

Accept the equality of all Muslims and non-Muslims.
Uphold the separation of state and religion.

Value and uphold the right of every individual to choose the religion of his or her choice, irrespective of the religion of the next of kin or community they might have belonged to by birth, or by association of any kind.

Closing thoughts
George Orwell in his novel "1984" described how the Western world might have fallen to the totalitarian temptation, as did F. A. Hayek in "The Road to Serfdom". This decay of our free societies into totalitarianism have not taken place on its own, but might come about through religious authority and pressure.
 
#14
#14
Why do you now call them "moslims" instead of muslim?

The American Heritage Dictionary (1992) noted, "Moslem is the form predominantly preferred in journalism and popular usage. Muslim is preferred by scholars and by English-speaking adherents of Islam."







Don't discount Cassius Clay's influence. He even refused induction.... Plus, all that hitting of infidels promoted violence on unprecedented levels. (Tongue in cheek)
Posted via VolNation Mobile


I won a ton getting 7 to 1 odds on Cassius vs Liston.

Clay changing his name is one of the great travesties of history.

The original Cassius Marcelus Clay claimed to be the man most responsible for the ending of slavery in America and there can be made a good case that his claim is true.

Clay the boxer, instead of honoring the name his parents had given him, changed it to a moslim name, seemingly without the knowledge that moslims had taken many more black african slaves than westerners ever had and had treated them far worse, all based on NOI racist, anti-white propagandistic rhetoric.




Goggles and the Sky Hook baby. gs had his jersey when he was lew alcindor.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I was a fan of Lew in the day.

I came back from overseas and made a dumb bet against UCLA for a dollar a game but getting the same bet for Vandy.

I knew Vandy had a great senior, what I didn't know was that UCLA was two time defending national champions.

When Alcindor was a freshman, freshmen couldn't play with the varsity and when the UCLA frosh beat the varsity by 15, 75/60, I thought I might have a chance of wining my bet.

As it turned out I ending up winning $5.
 
#15
#15
If Moslem/Moslim (you tend to alternate) are the correct journalistic terms, then why do the majority of media outlets use Muslim?

Oh wait, that was a definition that was nearly 20 years old!

You dinosaur.
 
#16
#16
From what he bolded, I get the sense that he uses "moslem" (I guess I misspelled it?) because that is the less preferred spelling/pronunciation of English speaking adherents to Islam.

Kind of childish.
 
#17
#17
From what he bolded, I get the sense that he uses "moslem" (I guess I misspelled it?) because that is the less preferred spelling/pronunciation of English speaking adherents to Islam.

Kind of childish.

Clearly, gsvol is removing all doubt of the fact that he isn't an adherent to the teachings of Muhammad simply by the spelling.

Because there was room for confusion before.
 
#18
#18
Many Americans will fawn over the Moose slims but eventually we will be warring with them right here on our own soil because we wrongly believe they are a peaceful religion.
 
#22
#22
Ridiculously blatant photo-shopped pictures with absurd cartoons incoming. Preceded by a link to a conspiracy theorist blog, crazy jabber from a tin foil hat message board and verbal attacks.
 
#25
#25
Kind of childish.

Why Do People Say Muslim Now Instead of Moslem?
A Muslim in Arabic means "one who gives himself to God," and is by definition, someone who adheres to Islam. By contrast, a Moslem in Arabic means "one who is evil and unjust" when the word is pronounced, as it is in English, Mozlem with a z.

His usage has nothing to do with usage of the day, and everything to do with the above.

It is definitely playground insults.
 

VN Store



Back
Top