1202 users online now!    CONTACT US | ADVERTISE | REGISTER       

About this Page -- This is a discussion on What do you define as rich?. within the forum Politics. I know alot of people throw out the magic number of 250k per year or more as being rich. I ...

Go Back   VolNation > Off Topic Forums > Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-22-2010, 05:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
You can call me Cracker
 
NEOCON's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,841
Likes: 1,636
What do you define as rich?

I know alot of people throw out the magic number of 250k per year or more as being rich. I personally think that is a load of crap. 250K does not make you wealthy. It makes you comfortable. Just wanted to know what you all thought what rate a person making 250k per year should be taxed at and what rate a person making 750K per year should be taxed at.
NEOCON is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 05:05 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 24,426
Likes: 0
If it takes 250 to be comfortable im poor.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
JTrainDavis is offline   Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 05:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
All VOL since 1965
 
WillisWG's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: suburbs of Normandy, TN...pop. 151
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 138
Depends on your point of view....looking down or looking up.

It is said that John Rockefeller upon hearing of J. P.Morgan’s death (1913) and the fact his fortune was then estimated at $80 million, said, “Why, he wasn’t even rich.”
__________________
"If my teams win, my press will be good. If we lose, the press can't help me anyhow." General Robert Neyland
WillisWG is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 05:33 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23,799
Likes: 1
250 means you are in the top 2% of the country in terms of salary. It's wealthy.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
dickens821 is offline   Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 05:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
JayVols's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,682
Likes: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTrainDavis View Post
If it takes 250 to be comfortable im poor.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Me, too! Where's MY food stamps?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
JayVols is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 05:38 PM   #6 (permalink)
Conspiracy?
 
T-TownVol's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ATL
Posts: 11,809
Likes: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ihatethebuckeyes View Post
I know alot of people throw out the magic number of 250k per year or more as being rich. I personally think that is a load of crap. 250K does not make you wealthy. It makes you comfortable. Just wanted to know what you all thought what rate a person making 250k per year should be taxed at and what rate a person making 750K per year should be taxed at.


The same as someone making 25K per year. 10% max with no exemptions.
T-TownVol is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 05:39 PM   #7 (permalink)
You can call me Cracker
 
NEOCON's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,841
Likes: 1,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by dickens821 View Post
250 means you are in the top 2% of the country in terms of salary. It's wealthy.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Tax bracket they should be in please?

Why is it wealthy just because it's top 5%?

Cost of living is going up much faster than average wage.
NEOCON is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 05:42 PM   #8 (permalink)
You can call me Cracker
 
NEOCON's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,841
Likes: 1,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-TownVol View Post
[/B]

The same as someone making 25K per year. 10% max with no exemptions.
I agree.

Also, if the taxes can't support the budget based on this then spending needs to be cut to match the tax revenue.
NEOCON is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 05:48 PM   #9 (permalink)
studyin' like heck
 
fl0at's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Memphis
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 8
I define "rich" as anyone who isn't poor. If you can honestly state that you are not poor, then you are rich. I cannot attach a monetary baseline to that, so brackets work for me.
fl0at is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 05:49 PM   #10 (permalink)
studyin' like heck
 
fl0at's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Memphis
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ihatethebuckeyes View Post
spending needs to be cut to match the tax revenue.
I like this statement, but I don't think 10% across the board would be enough.

We should do some math on this and figure out what would be an across the board percent. Anyone down for some number crunching?

What do you think would be an acceptable budget, buck? An end goal amount of money to collect, as it were.
fl0at is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 05:58 PM   #11 (permalink)
You can call me Cracker
 
NEOCON's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,841
Likes: 1,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by fl0at View Post
I like this statement, but I don't think 10% across the board would be enough.

We should do some math on this and figure out what would be an across the board percent. Anyone down for some number crunching?

What do you think would be an acceptable budget, buck? An end goal amount of money to collect, as it were.
I believe the budget should consist of federal funding for the military. I would give each soldier a raise. I would place federal funding to maintain roads. I would place enough money to take care of people who lose their jobs for 1 year. I would keep the Pell grants in and funding for colleges. I would make sure that each child who graduated with an A average or higher was given the financial means to attend college. I would throw in about 1% over the top for cats. I would also throw in 3% over the top for science R&D. Whatever this number is (I'm not going to calculate it right now but the figures are out there) I'd throw in an addition 4% over the top for funding of projects that are needed but I didn't name. Then whatever that number is I would cap the flat tax at.

Funding to N Korea gone. Aid packs to Africa gone. Welfare over a 12 month period gone. I mean completely gone. You either get a job or you starve to death. Brutal huh.
NEOCON is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 06:01 PM   #12 (permalink)
All VOL since 1965
 
WillisWG's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: suburbs of Normandy, TN...pop. 151
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 138
In 2008 the top-earning 5 percent of taxpayers (AGI over $159,619) earned 34.7 percent of the nation's adjusted gross income and paid approximately 58.7 percent of federal individual income taxes.

Also the top 0.1 percent (the top 10% of the top 1%) filed 140,000 tax returns, reporting nearly 10 percent of all adjusted gross income earned and paying approximately 18.5 percent of the nation's federal individual income taxes. The average income for a tax return for this group was $6.0 million with an average amount of income tax paid was $1.36 million...average effective individual income tax rate of 22.7 percent.

The Tax Foundation - Summary of Latest Federal Individual Income Tax Data
__________________
"If my teams win, my press will be good. If we lose, the press can't help me anyhow." General Robert Neyland
WillisWG is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 06:07 PM   #13 (permalink)
studyin' like heck
 
fl0at's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Memphis
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ihatethebuckeyes View Post
Then whatever that number is I would cap the flat tax at.
All of that wouldn't be terrible, but I don't know if it would be possible. I would be interested to know what that total was, and what that percentage might be. Might be something I attempt later on, depending on the complexity.

Is state funding provided, or is that a separate flat tax?
fl0at is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 06:12 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
vol_in_ar's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,569
Likes: 570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ihatethebuckeyes View Post
I know alot of people throw out the magic number of 250k per year or more as being rich. I personally think that is a load of crap. 250K does not make you wealthy. It makes you comfortable. Just wanted to know what you all thought what rate a person making 250k per year should be taxed at and what rate a person making 750K per year should be taxed at.
Everyone's going to have their own definition, but being comfortable and rich is really relative to each indivduals expectations..

If your making either 250K, or 750K, and spending most of it on Houses, Car's, Lifestle etc, without saving, you probably feel neither rich or poor, becasue you don't have the discretionary income and savings to feel either comfortable or rich
vol_in_ar is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 12-22-2010, 06:20 PM   #15 (permalink)
Conspiracy?
 
T-TownVol's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ATL
Posts: 11,809
Likes: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by fl0at View Post
I like this statement, but I don't think 10% across the board would be enough.

We should do some math on this and figure out what would be an across the board percent. Anyone down for some number crunching?

What do you think would be an acceptable budget, buck? An end goal amount of money to collect, as it were.
if EVERYONE paid 10% it would be enough
T-TownVol is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27