Quote:
Originally Posted by tigervol9802  Hasn't been discussed a lot on the boards but the GOP is going to control redistricting in about half the country now. Definite long-lasting benefit. |
This will help where republicans are the majority in
state legislatures, unfornately those areas solidly
controled by democrats will continue to send a
majority of dhimmis to Washington.
For instance here is Barney Frank's gerrymandered
district:
Not one state in those eleven who owe the most
money per capita elected anyone but a Democrat
to represent them in Washington.
Those eleven states are, with their per capita debt
in parentheses, in order:
Connecticut ($4,490)
Massachusetts ($4,323),
Hawaii ($3,675),
New Jersey ($3,621),
New York ($2,981),
Delaware ($2,128),
Washington ($2,087),
Illinois ($1,877),
Rhode Island ($1,812),
California ($1,805).
Oregon ($1,606).
Why should the people who live in states that are
fiscally responsible have to bail out the people in
states who are not??
Note too from the above list that they are among
the richest states of the union, why should the
poorer states have to reward the fiscal irresponsiblity
of the richer states??
Here is what should happen to states who have to
default on their loans:
Congress should invoke Article IV, Section 4 of the
Constitution, where the federal government
guarantees the states a republican government.
The state should lose its statehood and be demoted
to territorial status.
Its senators and congressmen should be expelled
from Congress.
Its governor, legislature and judges should be fired
and replaced by traditional territorial governance
from Washington.
The federal government should call a constitutional
convention for the territory, or perhaps split the
territory into more governable units and have each
new territory hold a constiutuional convention.
From there the usual procedures would be followed
in admitting new states.
Hopefully the republican party can learn something
from the tea party and furthermore if they don't learn
then they are in for a big downfall because there will
be third party candidates in the future that will draw
heavily from the republicrat vote but fewer from the
dhimmis which will probably shift power back to the
dhimmi side of the house isle, maybe even give them
back a filibuster proof senate again. (unthinkable)
Bottom line is that the republicrat elites had better
listen to their base or suffer the consequences.
For instance read this:
“Sadly, in California, Republican leaders tried to
campaign to the left of the Democrats and the
result was disastrous. While the rest of the country
was celebrating historic Republican gains (including
a net gain of at least 61 U.S. House Seats, 6 U.S.
Senate Seats, 680 state legislative seats, 19 state
legislatures and seven governors), the statewide
Republican ticket in California imploded and Republicans
actually lost a legislative seat in the Assembly.
Republicans nationally now hold more state legislative
seats than in any year since 1928, except in California
were they hold fewer than at any time since 1978!”
- - Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA4), November 4, 2010
So we find the the daughter of the rino Juan McLame
is completely FOS as to how the republican party
should chart it's future.
Many thinking Americans are highly upset, not only
with the dhimmis but with the republicrats as well
and the tea party does have it's share of disgruntled
democrat voters and all is not well inside the dhimmi
circle of ruling elites.
For instance the democrat candidate for the office
of governor of Rhode Island told obambi to stuff his
endorcement after Barry endorced the independent
rino Lincoln Chaffee.
As a matter of fact Lincoln Chaffee was mentioned
the last time the RNC called me asking for a campaign
contribution. One of the things that I told them
was 'never again', as long as they supported rinos
like Chaffee instead of a real republican and they
did just that again this year in several states, most
notable Delaware in which Rove and company
sabotaged their own republican party candidate
after she beat thier rino candidate in the primary.
Along that line it has come to light that Bush and
company are sabotaging Palin who is far closer to
mainstream America than eastern elites like the
Bush family will ever be.
Let me see if
we've got this straight...
The
BLUE states are in the
RED.
But the
RED states are in the
BLACK.
And the
BLUE states spend so much on
enviromental
GREEN, they don't have enough
GREEN
money to get them in the
BLACK.
Maybe the dhimmirats just put too much emphasis
on
COLOR.
Forums |
