1716 users online now!    CONTACT US | ADVERTISE | REGISTER       

About this Page -- This is a discussion on Stafford finally signs contract with Lions..... within the forum NFL Football. 6 years, $41.5 million according to NFL Network. Well, hopefully this turns out better than Harrington did about 6-7 years ...

Go Back   VolNation > Sports Forums > NFL Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-24-2009, 10:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
THE #1 COLLEGE DIFFENCE
 
KingNick865's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: A place somewhere
Posts: 13,445
Likes: 588
Stafford finally signs contract with Lions....

6 years, $41.5 million according to NFL Network.

Well, hopefully this turns out better than Harrington did about 6-7 years ago.
KingNick865 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-24-2009, 10:37 PM   #2 (permalink)
Vol Fanatic

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 5,193
Likes: 0
41.5 mil GUARANTEED

It's like 78 mil overall
bburger991 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-24-2009, 10:39 PM   #3 (permalink)
Extraordinary Member
 
volger's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 9,863
Likes: 842
Not bad for someone with no degree. Or did he have enough to graduate?
__________________
volger is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-25-2009, 01:47 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
TrueOrange's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Summer: Chattanooga; School year: St. Louis
Posts: 27,270
Likes: 785
All knew he'd be picked.

Curious, anyone know when the NFL first started letting the 1st pick team sign their draft pick before that year's draft?
TrueOrange is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-25-2009, 02:21 AM   #5 (permalink)
THE #1 COLLEGE DIFFENCE
 
KingNick865's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: A place somewhere
Posts: 13,445
Likes: 588
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueOrange View Post
All knew he'd be picked.

Curious, anyone know when the NFL first started letting the 1st pick team sign their draft pick before that year's draft?
I know that the Texans did it with Mario Williams in 2006.
KingNick865 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-25-2009, 07:23 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Panthro's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 975
Jake Long was signed a few days before the draft. Not sure when it first started though.
I don't like UGA at all, but I won't like root for this kid to fail. I just don't see him ever making it as an elite QB in the league. For that much money, he better be a freaking stud. I'd have gone with Jason Smith or Curry.
Panthro is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-25-2009, 07:50 AM   #7 (permalink)
THE #1 COLLEGE DIFFENCE
 
KingNick865's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: A place somewhere
Posts: 13,445
Likes: 588
I also seem to remember the Texans doing it in their first draft back in 2002 with David Carr.
KingNick865 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-25-2009, 08:12 AM   #8 (permalink)
Change is coming

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Port, FL
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panthro View Post
Jake Long was signed a few days before the draft. Not sure when it first started though.
I don't like UGA at all, but I won't like root for this kid to fail. I just don't see him ever making it as an elite QB in the league. For that much money, he better be a freaking stud. I'd have gone with Jason Smith or Curry.
Well, there are two scenarios for the 2010 Draft that the Lions could have been debating on.

1. "The Eric Berry Plan"---If they took Stafford this year, they know they are going to suck again and have a top 3 pick. With said pick, they are planning on taking Eric Berry.

2. "The McCoy/Bradford Plan"---If they took Jason Smith or Aaron Curry, they know they are going to suck again and have a top 3 pick. With said pick, they are planning on taking either Colt McCoy or Sam Bradford.

Since the Lions opted to sign Stafford and select him with the 1st overall pick, it seems Jim Schwartz is being true to himself and focusing on defense over the next few years by planning a year ahead to draft Eric Berry. It appears he covets defense over offense...starting in 2010.
orangetanker11 is offline   Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-25-2009, 08:14 AM   #9 (permalink)
Hanging with Smokey
 
jhen713's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: covington, ga
Posts: 52,738
Likes: 457
I don't care who it is. I can't see guarenteeing 41 million to anyone without seeing what they can do on an NFL field. If he never sees the field he is set for life if he is smart. And we wonder why NFL tickets are so expensive. There should be some tyoe of rookie cap for the first few years like there is in baseball. Then pay them the big bucks if they deserve it. JMO
__________________
Good judgment is obtained from experience…. experience is obtained from bad judgment.
jhen713 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-25-2009, 08:21 AM   #10 (permalink)
THE #1 COLLEGE DIFFENCE
 
KingNick865's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: A place somewhere
Posts: 13,445
Likes: 588
The history of good QB's going to expansion/bad teams is not that good.(Yes, that's about the type of talent the Lions have).....................

Let's see -

1999 - Tim Couch
2002 - David Carr
2002 - Joey Harrington
1988 - Andre Ware
1990 - David Klingler
1998 - Ryan Leaf(prolly would have failed, no matter which team he went to)
1993 - Rick Mirer(actually, his first year was better than Bledsoe's)
KingNick865 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-25-2009, 10:16 AM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Jaytrain5's Avatar

Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 11,033
Likes: 266
Never draft an underclassmen qb with a top 10 pick.
Jaytrain5 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-25-2009, 10:30 AM   #12 (permalink)
Bleating Minion
 
GAVol's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 68,526
Likes: 7,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueOrange View Post
All knew he'd be picked.

Curious, anyone know when the NFL first started letting the 1st pick team sign their draft pick before that year's draft?
I'm pretty sure that's been going on for a long time. It's probably a good idea since it takes "signability" out of the equation for the team with the #1 pick. If they didn't allow it, the #1 pick would have incredible leverage to drive up his price tag after the draft.
GAVol is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-25-2009, 10:30 AM   #13 (permalink)
VN's One and Only
 
duckman398686's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Big Orange Country
Posts: 21,345
Likes: 369
have fun with that lions....
__________________
duckman398686 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-25-2009, 10:37 AM   #14 (permalink)
Bleating Minion
 
GAVol's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 68,526
Likes: 7,639
Unless there was a clear cut, can't miss, genetic freak available I think I'd trade down from a top 5 pick almost every single time and just try to have more picks in the first 2-3 rounds than everybody else.

I never understand why a team stays pat in the top 5 or 10 and takes a guy that isn't that much, if any, better than a guy they could get 5-10 picks later.
GAVol is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-25-2009, 10:39 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Jaytrain5's Avatar

Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 11,033
Likes: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAVol View Post
Unless there was a clear cut, can't miss, genetic freak available I think I'd trade down from a top 5 pick almost every single time and just try to have more picks in the first 2-3 rounds than everybody else.
The challenge is finding a trade partner.
Jaytrain5 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27