 | | 
04-02-2008, 01:16 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | UT45-17
Join Date: Jul 2006  Location: FoCo
Posts: 21,209
Likes: 52
| Thank God
The owners were smart enough to agree to get rid of the stupid force out rule. And no more 5-yard facemask penalty. Unfortunately, no resolution was made on getting rid of the long hair.
__________________ E-Click Wrecking Crew  | 
|   | |
04-02-2008, 01:46 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | VN's One and Only
| i think they should have kept the 5 yard facemask rule
__________________ 
Last edited by duckman398686; 04-02-2008 at 02:02 PM..
| |
| | |
04-02-2008, 01:53 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Give me 3 more!!!
| The hair thing makes me mad. Tuck it in | |
| | |
04-02-2008, 01:59 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | UT45-17
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: FoCo
Posts: 21,209
Likes: 52
| When I lived in MI there was a morning show I listened to religiously and one of the djs would always say that people with long hair loved themselves so much and that was the only way to make more of themselves. Grow their hair longer. 
__________________ E-Click Wrecking Crew | |
| | |
04-02-2008, 02:01 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Berrydrinksyourmilkshake
Join Date: May 2007 Location: Memphis
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 164
| Quote:
Originally Posted by kev20  The owners were smart enough to agree to get rid of the stupid force out rule. And no more 5-yard facemask penalty. Unfortunately, no resolution was made on getting rid of the long hair. | What was stupid about the force out rule? Now all you're going to see is db's pushing/carrying WRs out of bounds. | |
| | |
04-02-2008, 02:16 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | UT45-17
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: FoCo
Posts: 21,209
Likes: 52
| Ruins the game. It will be no different than it is now except that an official won't be judge and jury of whether someone may or may not have been able to get both feet down in bounds. If you don't get two feet down in bounds, you're not in bounds. Simple as that.
__________________ E-Click Wrecking Crew | |
| | |
04-02-2008, 02:34 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Berrydrinksyourmilkshake
Join Date: May 2007 Location: Memphis
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 164
| Quote:
Originally Posted by kev20 Ruins the game. It will be no different than it is now except that an official won't be judge and jury of whether someone may or may not have been able to get both feet down in bounds. If you don't get two feet down in bounds, you're not in bounds. Simple as that. | It didn't ruin the game.
Now all you'll see is the defense pushing/carrying wrs out of bounds. A stationary wr jumps for a ball and a defender hits him in the air and carries him several feet to the sideline. That's lame. | |
| | |
04-02-2008, 02:39 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | UT45-17
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: FoCo
Posts: 21,209
Likes: 52
| That's out of bounds!
__________________ E-Click Wrecking Crew | |
| | |
04-02-2008, 03:56 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | VN's One and Only
| Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDeeble It didn't ruin the game.
Now all you'll see is the defense pushing/carrying wrs out of bounds. A stationary wr jumps for a ball and a defender hits him in the air and carries him several feet to the sideline. That's lame. | i tend to agree
__________________ | |
| | |
04-02-2008, 04:31 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | VN GURU
| I don't think you have to worry about a db carrying someone halfway across the field to keep him from getting his feet down.
__________________
| |
| | |
04-02-2008, 07:15 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | 13-14 in handshakes
| Quote:
Originally Posted by TennesseeFan07 The hair thing makes me mad. Tuck it in | Hair length has nothing to do with how the game is played. Forcing grown men to tuck their hair into their helmet is idiotic. | |
| | |
04-11-2008, 12:47 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Marion
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 5
| exactly there humans too they have the right to wear the hair how ever they like it | |
| | |
04-12-2008, 06:48 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Rational Thought Allowed?
| Without the force out rule, the NFL should go to one foot down.
Also, not sure if I understand getting rid of the 5-yard facemask penalty. Does this mean that any time a facemask is grabbed it will result in a 15 yard penalty? If so, that is absolutely ridiculous.
__________________
LG, when I think of UT football I think about world class sprinter WR's, like Gault,...fast bruising hard to tackle RB's, great OL play and a D that'll knock your d**k in the dirt. That's from the Johnny Major era thru the Philip Fulmer era.--HIGHTIDE 25 APR
Nam esse vitium et non nocere non potest | |
| | |
04-12-2008, 11:56 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | 13-14 in handshakes
| Quote:
Originally Posted by therealUT Without the force out rule, the NFL should go to one foot down.
Also, not sure if I understand getting rid of the 5-yard facemask penalty. Does this mean that any time a facemask is grabbed it will result in a 15 yard penalty? If so, that is absolutely ridiculous. | The facemask must be grabbed and jerked to draw a flag now from my understanding. | |
| | |
04-12-2008, 12:53 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Bleating Minion
| Quote:
Originally Posted by justingroves The facemask must be grabbed and jerked to draw a flag now from my understanding. | They've made the same change in college as well. | |
| | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | | |
 | |
Forums |
