 | 
06-23-2012, 01:35 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | 2nd grade citizen
Join Date: Aug 2007  Location: Hovering around .500
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 415
| NFL Network Top 100
I don't understand how Chris Johnson & Marshawn Lynch are so low on the list. NFL.com - Top 100 Players of 2012 | 
|   | |
06-24-2012, 08:02 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | 13-14 in handshakes
| What did Chris Johnson do last year? He looked tentative and scared of contact.
It doesn't go by career achievements, it's what they did last season | |
| | |
06-24-2012, 02:28 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | #ButchSlappin
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 701
| Quote:
Originally Posted by justingroves  What did Chris Johnson do last year? He looked tentative and scared of contact.
It doesn't go by career achievements, it's what they did last season | So then why was Peyton on the list? | |
| | |
06-24-2012, 11:39 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | 13-14 in handshakes
| Quote:
Originally Posted by HSVol So then why was Peyton on the list? | Sitting the bench, he's still a better QB than the majority of the starters in the NFL. | |
| | |
06-26-2012, 06:59 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 27,908
Likes: 2,935
| Quote:
Originally Posted by HSVol So then why was Peyton on the list? |  | |
| | |
06-26-2012, 07:00 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 27,908
Likes: 2,935
| Quote:
Originally Posted by justingroves It doesn't go by career achievements, it's what they did last season | Nope. It's top 100 players of 2012. It's speculative, and it's based on fan voting, it looks like.
So basically, it's a worthless, pointless list. | |
| | |
06-26-2012, 08:38 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | This We'll Defend
Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 45,893
Likes: 4,712
| There are 2 columns, one for fans and I assume the other for the writer(s) | |
| | |
06-26-2012, 08:57 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | That's the truth, Truth
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 10
| It's a players vote I think | |
| | |
06-26-2012, 09:47 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Summer: Chattanooga; School year: St. Louis
Posts: 27,253
Likes: 781
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Thrasher865 Nope. It's top 100 players of 2012. It's speculative, and it's based on fan voting, it looks like.
So basically, it's a worthless, pointless list. | Looks more like it's based on either player voting or some other outside source
For example, Johnson received a fan vote placing him at 61 overall, but he comes in ranked at 100 on the list. | |
| | |
06-26-2012, 11:14 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | 13-14 in handshakes
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Yankee_Vol There are 2 columns, one for fans and I assume the other for the writer(s) | It's players. Fans vote but do not effect the top 100 | |
| | |
06-26-2012, 11:15 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | 13-14 in handshakes
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Thrasher865 Nope. It's top 100 players of 2012. It's speculative, and it's based on fan voting, it looks like.
So basically, it's a worthless, pointless list. | But it's not based on fans, it's the guys that play the game that vote. | |
| | |
06-27-2012, 08:58 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | That's the truth, Truth
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 10
| Aaron rodgers number 1... Not surprising | |
| | |
07-01-2012, 11:22 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Rome, GA
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 709
| Quote:
Originally Posted by justingroves Sitting the bench, he's still a better QB than the majority of the starters in the NFL. | You say its about what they did last year. Johnson played, Peyton didn't, therefore he shouldn't be high on the list according to you. | |
| | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | | |
 | |
Forums |
