1527 users online now!    CONTACT US | ADVERTISE | REGISTER       

About this Page -- This is a discussion on Your Thoughts On The Players Wanting More Money. within the forum NFL Football. I think their all greedy blank holes.We are all struggling to make ends meet,and they are complaining they dont make ...

Go Back   VolNation > Sports Forums > NFL Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-29-2011, 12:55 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
orangetaz's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nashville Tennessee
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 536
Your Thoughts On The Players Wanting More Money

I think their all greedy blank holes.We are all struggling to make ends meet,and they are complaining they dont make enough.It makes me sick.I cant afford my electric bill much less a car,and they have all this money,and want more.Makes me

orangetaz is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-29-2011, 01:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
Gloomed to Fail
 
VKAman's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 6,952
Likes: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangetaz View Post
I think their all greedy blank holes.We are all struggling to make ends meet,and they are complaining they dont make enough.It makes me sick.I cant afford my electric bill much less a car,and they have all this money,and want more.Makes me

Is that what they're complaining about? A strike is when players hold out for more money, but this is a lockout; it's the owners. There does need to be a cap on rookie salaries, but the owners are the ones pushing an 18-game schedule, using the players for the sole purpose of making money for themselves. It's like the BCS or a 96-team NCAAT; they're pushing something that NO ONE wants to see, just so they can make money. That's on Goodell and the owners.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
VKAman is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-29-2011, 01:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fulton, KY
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 610
I don't think it's about money on the players' end. They have said they'd like the CBA to remain the same. Besides, it's a lockout, not a strike.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Vol_til_I_die is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-29-2011, 05:31 PM   #4 (permalink)
Diaper Dandy
 
Weezy's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,440
Likes: 193
Not only that, but the previous agreement had a number for the percentage of money that is supposed to go to player salaries (something like 40 or 60%), but the owners wont make their books available to the players union.
Weezy is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-29-2011, 05:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
smh
 
milohimself's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 47,720
Likes: 2,029
Yep. This decision is coming from the owners.

Have the owners even gone so far as to up salaries and expand rosters with the 18 game schedule, or are they still just trying to make these guys play two extra games?

And besides, these guys are not overpaid crybabies. There are a handful of prima donnas, but the vast majority of guys who play in the league are some schmoe who gets on a roster, sees a little bit of game time, makes practice squads for a few years then leaves with a lifetime of injuries and soreness with only a few hundred grand to show for it. The NFL is not showing near as much care for their ex players as they should be.
__________________
milohimself is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-30-2011, 02:15 AM   #6 (permalink)
Repeat Offender
 
superdave1984's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Fulton, TN
Posts: 4,361
Likes: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by milohimself View Post
Yep. This decision is coming from the owners.

Have the owners even gone so far as to up salaries and expand rosters with the 18 game schedule, or are they still just trying to make these guys play two extra games?

And besides, these guys are not overpaid crybabies. There are a handful of prima donnas, but the vast majority of guys who play in the league are some schmoe who gets on a roster, sees a little bit of game time, makes practice squads for a few years then leaves with a lifetime of injuries and soreness with only a few hundred grand to show for it. The NFL is not showing near as much care for their ex players as they should be.
Here's the issue behind it all. The healthcare of former players.
__________________
I will not go back.
superdave1984 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-30-2011, 08:45 AM   #7 (permalink)
5 star member
 
Cartervol's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hermitage, tn.
Posts: 18,321
Likes: 2,104
Healthcare and the rookie salary cap are the two main things. The 18 game schedule is a bad idea in my opinion but it looks like that will happen regardless.
Cartervol is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-30-2011, 08:48 AM   #8 (permalink)
Gloomed to Fail
 
VKAman's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 6,952
Likes: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cartervol View Post
Healthcare and the rookie salary cap are the two main things. The 18 game schedule is a bad idea in my opinion but it looks like that will happen regardless.
The 18 game schedule is a big part of the "safety of players" issue. It's not just about former players.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
VKAman is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-30-2011, 09:10 AM   #9 (permalink)
Matthew 6:2
 
doozer's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 13,290
Likes: 66
right now, i'm having a hard time believing there will be a season next year.
doozer is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-30-2011, 01:18 PM   #10 (permalink)
smh
 
milohimself's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 47,720
Likes: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by doozer View Post
right now, i'm having a hard time believing there will be a season next year.
I'm thinking there will be a short season.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
milohimself is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-30-2011, 01:22 PM   #11 (permalink)
smh
 
milohimself's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 47,720
Likes: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cartervol View Post
Healthcare and the rookie salary cap are the two main things. The 18 game schedule is a bad idea in my opinion but it looks like that will happen regardless.
The NFLPA is still holding firm completely against 18 games, as I think they should. The owners are not budging on it either though.

If I had to bet I'd say it will happen but not without improved healthcare and bumped salaries.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
milohimself is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-30-2011, 08:11 PM   #12 (permalink)
Fluidmaster
 
Vercingetorix's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 19,573
Likes: 2,325
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangetaz View Post
I think their all greedy blank holes.We are all struggling to make ends meet,and they are complaining they dont make enough.It makes me sick.I cant afford my electric bill much less a car,and they have all this money,and want more.Makes me

And this right here is why the owners know that they can basically impose whatever system they want, because they're guaranteed to win any labor dispute.
Vercingetorix is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-30-2011, 10:46 PM   #13 (permalink)
Inquisitor of Offense
 
Ohio Vol's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 78
I might be the only one who thinks that an 18-game schedule would actually cause less of a physical toll than a 16-game schedule. I say this for the following reasons.

1) Hitting starts early and often in training camp and lasts the entire preseason for multiple practices per day

2) Most teams, during the season, do hitting either two or three days, with one of them being a minimal-contact day

3) Most teams, once a playoff spot has been secured, rest their starters

4) Most teams, as the season progresses, scale back on the hitting a bit so guys don't get hurt in practice

5) Ergo, if there are only two preseason games and a reduction in the length of training camp PLUS an increase in the number of games (and therefore in important moments), the hitting during the practice week would not only be scaled back further, but dropped down to a minimum very quickly
__________________
"We had quitters during the Revolution too. We called them 'Kentuckians'." - George Washington
Ohio Vol is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-31-2011, 12:22 AM   #14 (permalink)
smh
 
milohimself's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 47,720
Likes: 2,029
Sketchy logic at work there, but it guarantees a worse product.

The last week or maybe two of the regular season are already pretty worthless, why make it worse?
__________________
milohimself is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 01-31-2011, 06:44 AM   #15 (permalink)
13-14 in handshakes

Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 26,835
Likes: 1,418
If the NFL expands to 18 games, rosters need to expand to around 65 with 54 or so guys active on gameday.

I'm against the 18 game schedule myself.
justingroves is offline   Reply With Quote TOP
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27