KingtUT
I reign supreme!
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 5,798
- Likes
- 3,694
Well, I'm in the minority against playoffs, but I don't think you can compare the FCS or whatever they call them now to the big schools. Their Athletic Departments don't market the programs like the FBS does.
Im somewhat against playoffs, not totally though. I look at the NFL, NBA, MLB, etc and see that each game in the regular season has less importance to the season as a whole than NCAAF does. Whether it is or not, each week feels like a playoff to me.
I used to be of this mentality, but the amount of corruption that props the bowl system up is undeniable. Besides, you can't tell me that a mere 4 team playoff would take any importance off any regular season games.
I'd be perfectly happy if we had
- current bowl system
- #1 vs #4 in Rose, #2 vs #3 in Fiesta (rotate to Orange/Sugar the next year, Fiesta/Rose the next year, and Sugar/Orange the next year)
- play the semifinals on New Years Day
- play the other two BCS bowls plus some crap bowls in the week after New Years as they already do
- BCS championship game on the 8th (or thereabouts)
Basically, the only changes you need to make to what we have right now are (1) BCS championship isn't a separate bowl but rather a +1 game and (2) 1/4 and 2/3 seedings in 2 of the BCS bowls.
Then what's the problem with a plus one? You just said the big boys would slaughter the mid majors....why not let them prove it on the field?Boise ruined the reasoning for a playoff this year IMO....
I think Auburn would have hung 50 or 60 on them if they met in the title, same way with TCU, although their defense is actually pretty good.
I predict TCU gets killed by Wisconsin, and maybe all this non-AQ crying over not getting into the big dance will stop.
So taking the field from two to four shouldn't happen because one of the four might not be as deserving? A less deserving team would have to beat two "more deserving" teams to win a title, so that kind of negates the argument that said team was less deserving.problem is they could take the spot from a more deserving team.
So taking the field from two to four shouldn't happen because one of the four might not be as deserving? A less deserving team would have to beat two "more deserving" teams to win a title, so that kind of negates the argument that said team was less deserving.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
There are so many that clamor for a playoff and saying "see, FCS does it" but fail to look at the entire picture.It's the FCS playoffs....you can't compare FCS ratings to FBS ratings.....
All of you out there screaming for a playoff, please tell me why? You do know that if we had a playoff Tennessee would not be in a bowl this year. Would that make you happy?
Also, don't you see how great the whole season is in Div1 college FB? The season in itself is a season long playoff, making every weekend a playoff weekend.
What are you searching for, an at large team, a conf 2nd place team becoming National Champion. Do you want to see a Boise State or TCU get blown out in the BCS Championship game. Since the BCS has been in place (12 years) the winner has few arguments to the claim as National Champion.
Tell me please what would a playoff do, except dilute the regular season, destroy the excitement of a team like Tennessee winning 4 in a row to become bowl eligible, allow for 2nd place teams to get a third chance at a national championship. Would you like to see Auburn have to beat South Carolina 3 times to become National Champion, or are you wanting all 3 11-1 Big11 teams with a chance. WAKE UP don't dilute the greatest season of all DIVISION I College Football!!!