ClearwaterVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2008
- Messages
- 16,113
- Likes
- 17,657
Well, we know Clearwater supports hypocrisy. We'll just add Huff to that list as well.
Thread starts out bashing a conservative talking head being a reason that people think all repubs are bigots for actions on a plane.
Someone posts that they think it's funny how she was flying coach.
I ask "And..." hoping to get an explanation as to why that's funny.
Someone replies to me as a counter to the previous "funny" post by mentioning she should be more like hypocritical lefties and how they choose to fly.
Clearwater posts that he says he doesn't understand what that has to do with anything.
Huff also doesn't understand.
Not understand a response doesn't mean it's not relevant. It could just mean that you're stupid.
So, apparently your argument is that by flying first class she would have impacted carbon levels more?
Not understanding your argument makes you stupid. Of course I am not saying you're stupid. Just a generalization. As a basic premise, arguments should stay with the subject matter at hand. The but so and so did it is a ill conceived argument.