Seantrel Henderson/USC/Violations

[BIG BOI 23]

Originally Posted by nickknx865

No.

yes

rivals dropped the ball this year because of their ranking system


like i said usc isnt even top 5 on the other sites

[tvolsfan]

rivals doesn't need other sites to tell it what's good.

[DaddyChad]

Originally Posted by BIG BOI 23

yes

rivals dropped the ball this year because of their ranking system


like i said usc isnt even top 5 on the other sites

Who would you rank ahead of USC's class as far as talent? Keep in mind USC couldn't take as many as some other schools because they were already close on the scholarship limit. Saying that a school like Auburn who got some talented players but also a lot of fluff out recruited them would be laughable. Rivals usually does the best job of evaluating and ranking the recruits of any service, Scout doesn't impress me as much, ESPN is just pathetic.

[droski]

rivals ranks based on quality, not quantity. which is how it should be. why should bama et all get credit for taking 10 extra guys they know for sure wont qualify? non sec schools take less players. in the end it matters who is on your actual team.

[BIG BOI 23]

Originally Posted by DaddyChad

Who would you rank ahead of USC's class as far as talent? Keep in mind USC couldn't take as many as some other schools because they were already close on the scholarship limit. Saying that a school like Auburn who got some talented players but also a lot of fluff out recruited them would be laughable. Rivals usually does the best job of evaluating and ranking the recruits of any service, Scout doesn't impress me as much, ESPN is just pathetic.

we'll find out how espn is in the future they got way more money to go out and actually watch these kids then anybody else so i dont see how you can say their pathetic


they definitely dont just follow what rivals thinks tho(good thing imo) look at johnathan dowling he's the top saftey on espn and wasnt even in the top 250 on rivals and guess what he got 2 picks in the UA all star game and they still got him at 3*

this is why i say having more 3 and 4* guys shouldnt hurt your score on rivals becuase those guys can turn out to be great players




theres a plenty of other guys that have been rated 3 star by rivals that turn out to be great dexter mcluster comes to mind

[DaddyChad]

Originally Posted by BIG BOI 23

we'll find out how espn is in the future they got way more money to go out and actually watch these kids then anybody else so i dont see how you can say their pathetic

they definitely dont just follow what rivals thinks tho(good thing imo) look at johnathan dowling he's the top saftey on espn and wasnt even in the top 250 on rivals and guess what he got 2 picks in the UA all star game and they still got him at 3*

this is why i say having more 3 and 4* guys shouldnt hurt your score on rivals becuase those guys can turn out to be great players

theres a plenty of other guys that have been rated 3 star by rivals that turn out to be great dexter mcluster comes to mind

Because they are pathetic. Anyone who follows recruiting year in and out knows that. Just because the hit on one guy that rivals or scout misses on doesn't mean much when they are off on so many other recruits.

Just looking at the guys USC landed and their class as a whole, I would take Florida's class above them and that is about it. How anyone can say they were not a top five class with a straight face is beyond me.

[VolDC]

Henderson will commit to USC:

Seantrel Henderson is officially a Trojan. (Well, almost ...) - Dr. Saturday - NCAAF Blog - Yahoo! Sports