563 users online now!    CONTACT US | ADVERTISE | REGISTER       

About this Page -- This is a discussion on Looks like the NCAA is about to go head hunting now... Page 9. within the forum Around the NCAA. FYI: NCAA says no to Paterno family appeal of sanctions "The Paternos' letter, obtained by Onward State, an online news ...

Go Back   VolNation > Tennessee Vols Forums > Around the NCAA

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-03-2012, 10:00 PM   #121 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
vols-1's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,897
Likes: 597
FYI:

NCAA says no to Paterno family appeal of sanctions

"The Paternos' letter, obtained by Onward State, an online news organization serving the Penn State community, states that the NCAA "acted hastily and without any regard for due process" and that the Freeh Report is "deeply flawed because it is incomplete, rife with unsupported opinions and unquestionably one-sided." The Paterno family also had requested an in-person argument before the Infractions Appeals Committee, the letter states.
__________________
"I just didn't get stupid overnight" Jonathan Crompton
vols-1 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 08-03-2012, 10:02 PM   #122 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
BUBear's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Somewhere along the San Jac
Posts: 907
Likes: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvols75 View Post
Considering that immediate action was taken and the basketball program didn't harbor a murderer and a pathetic coach, I would say it was very different. If someone had stood up back in the 90s, the punishment would have been the same as Baylor's.
You Sir know your facts. I'm still waiting for the NCAA to strip PSU of all OOC games for a season!!!
BUBear is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 08-03-2012, 10:14 PM   #123 (permalink)
You huge girl!!
 
g8terh8ter_eric's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 25,751
Likes: 1,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvols75 View Post
Considering that immediate action was taken and the basketball program didn't harbor a murderer and a pathetic coach, I would say it was very different. If someone had stood up back in the 90s, the punishment would have been the same as Baylor's.
There was an investigation, and the DA couldn't get enough evidence to charge Sundusky, or send it to trial for that matter.
__________________
g8terh8ter_eric is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 08-03-2012, 10:47 PM   #124 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
BUBear's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Somewhere along the San Jac
Posts: 907
Likes: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by g8terh8ter_eric View Post
There was an investigation, and the DA couldn't get enough evidence to charge Sundusky, or send it to trial for that matter.
Wink, WINK.
BUBear is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 08-04-2012, 05:20 AM   #125 (permalink)
THE #1 COLLEGE DIFFENCE
 
KingNick865's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: A place somewhere
Posts: 13,445
Likes: 588
Quote:
Originally Posted by g8terh8ter_eric View Post
There was an investigation, and the DA couldn't get enough evidence to charge Sundusky, or send it to trial for that matter.
I'm not too sure about that one. There was certianly some evidence there, even a confession from Sandusky that he showered naked with one of the victims back in 1998 in the grand jury report in November of 2011.

Quote:
Jerry Lauro, an investigator with the Department of Public Welfare, testified that during the 1998 investigation, Sandusky was interviewed on June 1, 1998, by Lauro and Detective Schreffler. Sandusky admitted showering naked with Victim 6, admitted to
hugging Victim 6 while in the shower and admitted that it was wrong. Detective Schreffler advised Sandusky not to shower with any child again and Sandusky said that he would not.
- source
KingNick865 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 08-04-2012, 12:19 PM   #126 (permalink)
I get it!
 
MyBloodRunnethOrange's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,042
Likes: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by g8terh8ter_eric View Post
An honest question as well for those who support the NCAA's decision to get involved.....

What did the NCAA do to ever prevent this from happening again??

If your answer is anything except "nothing", then you are honestly pretty naive to think that reducing some schollies and fining a university, is going to keep some sicko from molesting children.
No, but it might make TPTB at another institution think twice before covering it up.
MyBloodRunnethOrange is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 08-04-2012, 12:51 PM   #127 (permalink)
WOODHOUSE!!!
 
slh1089's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 406
Quote:
Originally Posted by bleedorange0037 View Post
Fair enough. What about the business owners in State College who are going to see their business suffer because of decreased attendance due to the football program being irrelevant for the next several years? Do you think they knew about Sandusky's crimes as well?
You get on people about using hypotheticals; however, this is exactly what you argue here.
slh1089 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27